Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta AI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
8.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
2.8× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 8.3× input, 2.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
34%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
61%Vocabulary54%
20wSentence Length16w
0.10Hedging0.31
3.7Bold6.0
2.0Lists4.5
0.01Emoji0.58
0.52Headings0.88
0.02Transitions0.10
Based on 29 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
