What is the difference between Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Muse Spark 1.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

It depends on your use case. Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Muse Spark 1.1 cost compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $1.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jul 2026

Muse Spark 1.1vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 at $0.15/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	Muse Spark 1.1	Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price	$1.25/M tokens	$0.15/M tokens
Output price	$4.25/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	1.0M tokens	66K tokens
Weights	Closed	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Jul 2026	Sep 2025