OpenAI o3 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
Compare OpenAI o3 by OpenAI against Qwen3 Coder Flash by Qwen, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, OpenAI o3 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?
OpenAI o3 and Qwen3 Coder Flash are both competitive models. OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen3 Coder Flash. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between OpenAI o3 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
OpenAI o3 is made by openai while Qwen3 Coder Flash is from qwen. On pricing, OpenAI o3 costs $10/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for Qwen3 Coder Flash.
API pricing
Per 1M tokens
OpenAI o3
Input
$10.00
Output
$40.00
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
33× cheaper
Output
$1.50
27× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on both — 33× input, 27× output
Our Verdict
OpenAI o3
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, OpenAI o3 has the edge — bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Coder Flash is 27x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 8.7x more bold
OpenAI o3
Qwen3 Coder Flash
68%Vocabulary60%
14wSentence Length92w
0.26Hedging0.60
0.7Bold6.1
3.0Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.38Headings1.64
0.12Transitions0.18
Based on 16 + 22 text responses
FAQ
