OpenAI o4-minivsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
OpenAI o4-mini is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $1.1/M vs $2/M input tokens.
| Spec | OpenAI o4-mini | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.1/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2026 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
OpenAI o4-miniRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
OpenAI o4-mini
Input
$1.10
1.8× cheaper
Output
$4.40
1.4× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
OpenAI o4-mini is cheaper on both: 1.8× input, 1.4× output.
Where to run it
8 hosts, cheapest first
OpenAI o4-mini1 host
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
33%
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B uses 312.2x more bold
OpenAI o4-mini
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
73%Vocabulary53%
21wSentence Length18w
0.39Hedging0.83
0.0Bold3.1
2.0Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings1.34
0.05Transitions0.05
Based on 17 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
OpenAI o4-mini vs Ox AlphaNew provider
OpenAI o4-mini vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
OpenAI o4-mini vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewNew provider
OpenAI o4-mini vs MiMo-V2-FlashNew provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs MiMo-V2-OmniNew provider
OpenAI o4-mini vs MiMo-V2-ProNew provider