Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507, both from Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
3.6× cheaper
Output
$0.60
6.7× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 6.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
89%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 1.6x more emoji
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
54%Vocabulary56%
15wSentence Length14w
0.36Hedging0.37
7.0Bold5.7
4.6Lists4.0
0.34Emoji0.54
0.94Headings0.70
0.09Transitions0.14
Based on 18 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
