Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507, both from Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 37 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
3.6× cheaper
Output
$0.60
6.7× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 6.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
89%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 1.6x more emoji
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
54%Vocabulary56%
15wSentence Length14w
0.36Hedging0.37
7.0Bold5.7
4.6Lists4.0
0.34Emoji0.54
0.94Headings0.70
0.09Transitions0.14
Based on 18 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
