Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs OpenAI o3
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 by Qwen against OpenAI o3 by OpenAI, in 6 community votes, openai o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, tested across 31 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 or OpenAI o3?
OpenAI o3 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 6 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens vs $10/M for OpenAI o3. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and OpenAI o3
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is made by qwen while OpenAI o3 is from openai. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens vs $10/M for OpenAI o3. In community voting, In 6 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 6 community votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. OpenAI o3 has the edge overall, but performance varies by task type. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 6+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Image Generation: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and OpenAI o3 are tied
Our Verdict
OpenAI o3Winner
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507Runner-up
Pick OpenAI o3. In 6 blind votes, OpenAI o3 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is 47059x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
95%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 uses 44.8x more emoji
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
OpenAI o3
57%Vocabulary68%
18wSentence Length14w
0.40Hedging0.26
5.9Bold0.7
4.8Lists3.0
0.45Emoji0.00
1.07Headings0.38
0.11Transitions0.12
Based on 18 + 16 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ