Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B, both from Qwen, tested across 31 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
What is the difference between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. You can compare their actual outputs across 31 challenges on RIVAL to see how they differ in practice.
Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
It depends on your use case. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. RIVAL lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 31 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
How much does Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is $0.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on RIVAL to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
How can I compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on RIVAL?
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output, and Pro users can create custom challenges to test both models with their own prompts.