Rival
Sign Up

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5 Pro

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen against GPT-5 Pro by OpenAI, context windows of 131K vs 400K, tested across 31 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or GPT-5 Pro?

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and GPT-5 Pro are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $15/M for GPT-5 Pro. Context windows: 131K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and GPT-5 Pro

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while GPT-5 Pro is from openai. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to GPT-5 Pro's 400K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $15/M for GPT-5 Pro.

Our Verdict
GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5 Pro has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 200x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 571.0x more bold

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
GPT-5 Pro
56%Vocabulary65%
14wSentence Length15w
0.37Hedging0.32
5.7Bold0.0
4.0Lists2.9
0.54Emoji0.00
0.70Headings0.00
0.14Transitions0.01
Based on 22 + 11 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507GPT-5 Pro
FAQ
Keep going
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
GPT-5 Pro logoPony Alpha logo
GPT-5 Pro vs Pony AlphaNew provider
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGrok 3 logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 3New provider