Rival
Sign Up

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 20B

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen against GPT OSS 20B by OpenAI, in 27 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 68% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 131K, tested across 40 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or GPT OSS 20B?

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 68% of 27 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.02/M for GPT OSS 20B. Context windows: 131K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and GPT OSS 20B

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while GPT OSS 20B is from openai. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to GPT OSS 20B's 131K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.02/M for GPT OSS 20B. In community voting, In 27 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 68% of head-to-head duels.

In 27 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 68% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Web Design, Reasoning, Conversation, while GPT OSS 20B leads in Analysis. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 27+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 57% of votes
Reasoning: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 80% of votes
Conversation: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of votes
Image Generation: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 75% of votes
Analysis: GPT OSS 20B wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
GPT OSS 20B
GPT OSS 20BRunner-up

Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 27 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 68% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for Conversation, Reasoning, Image Generation. Pick GPT OSS 20B for Analysis. GPT OSS 20B is 6.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
93%

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 5.3x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
GPT OSS 20B
56%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length17w
0.37Hedging0.26
5.7Bold5.9
4.0Lists3.3
0.54Emoji0.10
0.70Headings0.75
0.14Transitions0.32
Based on 22 + 21 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507GPT OSS 20B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
Download the free previewor get all 58 slides for $49
FAQ

Common questions

Keep going
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoPony Alpha logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Pony AlphaNew provider
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT OSS 120B logo
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 120BCross-provider