Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 30B A3B, both from Qwen, in 1 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 41K, tested across 40 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0/M for Qwen3 30B A3B. Context windows: 131K vs 41K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Qwen3 30B A3B is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 41K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0/M for Qwen3 30B A3B. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3BRunner-up

Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 1 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
99%

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 70.3x more headings

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B
56%Vocabulary60%
14wSentence Length11w
0.37Hedging0.24
5.7Bold7.6
4.0Lists4.6
0.54Emoji0.36
0.70Headings0.00
0.14Transitions0.06
Based on 22 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3 30B A3B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions