Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, both from Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 131K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Ask them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, both from Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 67% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 131K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Ask them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

49 fights queued
37+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy
49 fights queued
37+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy