Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, both from Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 66K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
1.4× cheaper
Output
$0.60
2.5× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
Output
$1.50
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 1.4× input, 2.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
71%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
56%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length16w
0.37Hedging0.31
5.7Bold6.0
4.0Lists4.5
0.54Emoji0.58
0.70Headings0.88
0.14Transitions0.10
Based on 22 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
