Qwen3 235B A22B
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Claude Opus 4
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, in 10 community votes, claude opus 4 wins 78% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 33K vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 is the better choice overall, winning 78% of 10 blind community votes on Rival. Context windows: 33K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen3 235B A22B and Claude Opus 4
Qwen3 235B A22B is made by qwen while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Qwen3 235B A22B has a 33K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. In community voting, In 10 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 78% of head-to-head duels.
In 10 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 78% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 10+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4 wins 83% of votes
Analysis: Qwen3 235B A22B and Claude Opus 4 are tied
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4Winner
Qwen3 235B A22BRunner-up
Pick Claude Opus 4. In 10 blind votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 78% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude Opus 4 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
77%
Claude Opus 4 uses 52.1x more hedging
Qwen3 235B A22B
Claude Opus 4
68%Vocabulary64%
9wSentence Length62w
0.00Hedging0.52
5.8Bold4.4
3.7Lists9.1
0.74Emoji0.11
0.00Headings1.87
0.12Transitions0.27
Based on 2 + 16 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ