Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507, both from Qwen, context windows of 33K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input
—
Output
—
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
Output
$0.60
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
67%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 37.5x more hedging
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
68%Vocabulary56%
9wSentence Length14w
0.00Hedging0.37
5.8Bold5.7
3.7Lists4.0
0.74Emoji0.54
0.00Headings0.70
0.12Transitions0.14
Based on 2 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
