Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 4
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 by Qwen against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, in 1 community votes, claude opus 4 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 200K, tested across 28 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Claude Opus 4?
Claude Opus 4 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 131K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Claude Opus 4
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is made by qwen while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Claude Opus 4. In 1 blind votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is 94x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 9.3x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.








