Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507vsQwen3 Max Thinking
Updated Feb 2026

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507vsQwen3 Max Thinking

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking at $0.2/M vs $1.2/M input tokens.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Max Thinking compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input price$0.2/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Output price$0.8/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507350 words
Setting: A dimly lit tavern in a fantastical crossroads of time—pirates, knights, and hackers all share a single table. A flickering lantern casts long shadows. Pirate (Captain Rook, eye patch, peg leg): Aye, what’s this “AI model” ye be yammerin’ about? Sounds like a cursed sea chart that reads yer mind!
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking294 words
Setting: A misty, anachronistic crossroads. A glowing laptop rests on a weathered barrel. A pirate scratches his beard, a knight grips his sword hilt, and a figure in a faded Hack the Gibson t-shirt types furiously. Pirate: Arrr! What devilry be this glowing slate? Can it chart a course to buried treasure?
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507668 words
[FADE IN: A dimly lit, minimalist stage. A single spotlight shines on a man in his late 70s—Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, standing before a sleek, transparent holographic display. The backdrop reads: “The Future of Intelligence – A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025.”
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking668 words
⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER *This is an entirely fictional, speculative exercise. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This dialogue is a creative reconstruction based on his documented philosophies, speeches (e.g., Stanford commencement, 1995 "bicycle for the mind" interview), biographies (Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson), and…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25071,617 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the ripple effects would be profound—reshaping technology, war, geopolitics, and society by 1980. This alternate history would not merely accelerate existing trends, but fundamentally reconstruct the trajectory of modern civilization.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking1,156 words
The 1920 Transistor Counterfactual: A Plausible Alternate Timeline Through 1980 (Assumptions: A functional point-contact silicon-germanium hybrid transistor is patented in 1920 by a U.S. team at Western Electric (AT&T). U.S. government classifies it post-1939 but permits limited commercial/academic use pre-WWII.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25071,424 words
Your real-time collaborative document editor architecture is well-structured for a scalable, low-latency system — but it contains several critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks that could degrade user experience or cause data loss.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking769 words
Critical Flaws in Proposed Architecture & Targeted Solutions 🔒 Security & Authentication Issue Impact Solution Trade-offs JWT Stored in localStorage Critical XSS vulnerability (token exposure via JS). Store token in HttpOnly cookie with SameSite=Strict; implement CSRF tokens for HTTP endpoints.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507207 words
Dish Name: Sunny Sauté Skillet Ingredients (7 pantry staples): Olive oil Garlic (fresh, minced) Dried spaghetti (or any short pasta) Canned crushed tomatoes Dried oregano Salt & black pepper Grated Parmesan cheese Instructions: Prep (5 mins): Bring a pot of salted water to a boil.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking288 words
🌰 Pantry Peanut Magic Noodles Sweet, savory, and ready before delivery arrives. No fresh produce, dairy, or meat required. ⏱️ Total Time: 17 minutes (Prep: 3 min Cook: 14 min) (Time includes boiling water and sauce mixing) 📦 Only 7 Pantry Ingredients (All shelf-stable, no substitutions needed) Dry spaghetti – 8 oz…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25071,728 words
The provided Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that are heavily one-sided in favor of the Client and could significantly disadvantage the Contractor, potentially rendering the agreement unenforceable or exploitative under contract law, fairness principles, and standard industry practices.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking994 words
⚠️ DISCLAIMER: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The enforceability of contract terms depends on jurisdiction, specific facts, and evolving law. Contractor must consult qualified legal counsel before signing.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 Max Thinking has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 7.5x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
6.0× cheaper
Output
$0.80
7.5× cheaper
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 6.0× input, 7.5× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25075 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·99.2% upDDekaLLM$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·98.2% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·98.4% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·99.8% upNNebiusfp8degraded$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·93.1% up
Qwen3 Max Thinking1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.78 in·$3.90 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
75%

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 2.4x more transitions

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 Max Thinking
55%Vocabulary63%
19wSentence Length14w
0.46Hedging0.23
6.4Bold4.5
3.9Lists2.9
1.10Emoji2.26
0.86Headings0.80
0.14Transitions0.06
Based on 28 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has a 131K token context window vs Qwen3 Max Thinking's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Max Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens and Qwen3 Max Thinking costs $1.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Max Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoCommand A+ logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Grok 4.1 FastSame size
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGrok 4.20 Beta logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Grok 4.20 BetaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 250759 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Max Thinking logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed