Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, both from Qwen, in 27 community votes, qwen3 next 80b a3b instruct wins 56% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 66K, tested across 55 shared challenges.
Web Design: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 wins 57% of votes
Image Generation: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins 67% of votes
Analysis: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct are tied
Reasoning: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct are tied
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructWinner
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct has the edge overall. In 27 blind votes, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins 56% of the time.
Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for Web Design. Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for Image Generation.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
Output
$0.80
1.9× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.15
1.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 wins output (1.9× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
83%
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 2.5x more hedging
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
55%Vocabulary52%
18wSentence Length16w
0.52Hedging0.20
6.7Bold5.8
4.3Lists3.7
1.04Emoji0.59
0.92Headings0.96
0.11Transitions0.05
Based on 22 + 20 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
