Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 38 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are both competitive models. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05. Context windows: 262K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is from google. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's 1049K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 35x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
99%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
54%Vocabulary51%
14wSentence Length15w
0.12Hedging0.31
7.5Bold4.8
4.2Lists4.1
0.68Emoji0.00
0.93Headings0.98
0.12Transitions0.05
Based on 16 + 20 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions