Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking are both competitive models. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Context windows: 262K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is from qwen. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking's 262K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 17× input, 21× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 21x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 3.4x more transitions
