Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs QwQ 32B

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and QwQ 32B, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 40K, tested across 15 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or QwQ 32B?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and QwQ 32B are both competitive models. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 262K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and QwQ 32B

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while QwQ 32B is from qwen. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B.

Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
QwQ 32B
QwQ 32BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 5.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
99%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
QwQ 32B
54%Vocabulary64%
14wSentence Length12w
0.12Hedging0.36
7.5Bold13.6
4.2Lists8.4
0.68Emoji0.00
0.93Headings0.00
0.12Transitions0.39
Based on 16 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507QwQ 32B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions