Qwen3 30B A3B vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B by Qwen against GPT-4.1 Nano by OpenAI, in 13 community votes, gpt-4.1 nano wins 58% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 41K vs 1.0M, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated March 2026.

Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B or GPT-4.1 Nano?

GPT-4.1 Nano is the better choice overall, winning 58% of 13 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for GPT-4.1 Nano. Context windows: 41K vs 1048K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B and GPT-4.1 Nano

Qwen3 30B A3B is made by qwen while GPT-4.1 Nano is from openai. Qwen3 30B A3B has a 41K token context window compared to GPT-4.1 Nano's 1048K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.1/M for GPT-4.1 Nano. In community voting, In 13 community votes, GPT-4.1 Nano wins 58% of head-to-head duels.

In 13 community votes, GPT-4.1 Nano wins 58% of head-to-head duels. Qwen3 30B A3B leads in Analysis, while GPT-4.1 Nano leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 13+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Image Generation: GPT-4.1 Nano wins 83% of votes
Analysis: Qwen3 30B A3B wins 67% of votes
Reasoning: Qwen3 30B A3B and GPT-4.1 Nano are tied
Our Verdict
GPT-4.1 Nano
GPT-4.1 NanoWinner
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3BRunner-up

Pick GPT-4.1 Nano. In 13 blind votes, GPT-4.1 Nano wins 58% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for Analysis. Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for Image Generation.

Clear winner
FAQ

This comparison gets 800+ views/month. Your brand could be here.

Advertise