Qwen3 30B A3B vs MiniMax M1

Compare Qwen3 30B A3B by Qwen against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 41K vs 1.0M, tested across 26 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B or MiniMax M1?

Qwen3 30B A3B and MiniMax M1 are both competitive models. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 41K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B and MiniMax M1

Qwen3 30B A3B is made by qwen while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Qwen3 30B A3B has a 41K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1.

Our Verdict
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 30B A3BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, MiniMax M1 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
88%

MiniMax M1 uses 86.2x more headings

Qwen3 30B A3B
MiniMax M1
60%Vocabulary53%
11wSentence Length17w
0.24Hedging0.51
7.6Bold7.4
4.6Lists6.2
0.36Emoji0.10
0.00Headings0.86
0.06Transitions0.03
Based on 4 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen3 30B A3BMiniMax M1

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions