Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking and Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking or Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking and Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking costs $1.2/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B. Context windows: 262K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking and Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is made by qwen while Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking costs $1.2/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 1.9× output
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking has the edge — bigger model tier.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking uses 13.2x more emoji
