Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B or Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B?
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B. Context windows: 262K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is made by qwen while Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B has a 262K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B's 262K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.3/M input tokens vs $0.25/M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper on both — 1.2× input, 1.2× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
