What is the difference between Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.3/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is $0.30/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B costs $0.3/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is $0.30/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Which Is Better?

Rival

Updated Feb 2026

Our Verdict

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge — bigger model tier.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B

Input

$0.30

2.0× cheaper

Output

$2.40

1.5× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 1.5× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

88%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

51%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.32Hedging0.39

7.3Bold6.9

4.8Lists4.2

0.01Emoji0.23

0.87Headings0.93

0.19Transitions0.17

Based on 23 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs GPT-5New provider

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Rival

Updated Feb 2026

Our Verdict

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge — bigger model tier.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B

Input

$0.30

2.0× cheaper

Output

$2.40

1.5× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 1.5× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

88%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

51%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.32Hedging0.39

7.3Bold6.9

4.8Lists4.2

0.01Emoji0.23

0.87Headings0.93

0.19Transitions0.17

Based on 23 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs GPT-5New provider

Qwen: Qwen3.5 27B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Rival