Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)
Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI, context windows of 262K vs 128K, tested across 32 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against ChatGPT-4o (March 2025) by OpenAI, context windows of 262K vs 128K, tested across 32 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
27 challenges
Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Here are 5 jokes:
How many are unique? All 5 are unique (none of them are duplicates of each other).
Here are 5 jokes:
Why don’t skeletons fight each other?
Because they don’t have the guts.
I told my computer I needed a break…
Now it won’t stop sending me vacation ads.
Parallel lines have so much in common.
It’s a shame they’ll never meet.
What do you call a fish wearing a bowtie?
Sofishticated.
I asked the librarian if the library had books on paranoia.
She whispered, "They're right behind you..."
All 5 jokes are unique — none of them repeat or share the same punchline.
Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability
(The comedian walks to the center of the stage, adjusts the mic stand, and looks at the audience with a tired smile.)
Has anyone else noticed that calling a customer service line is the only situation in life where you voluntarily enter a hostage negotiation?
I tried to call my internet provider yesterday. Just to ask why my bill went up fifty dollars. I pick up the phone, and immediately, I'm attacked by a voice that is too cheerful for the circumstances.
"Thank you for calling! Please listen closely, as our menu options have changed."
They always say that. The options haven't changed. They've just added three new layers of hell to the bottom of the list.
"Press one for billing. Press two for technical support. Press three to speak to a representative… in the next three to five business days."
I press one. Then I get the hold music. You know the song? It's always the same smooth jazz saxophone loop. It's not music; it's psychological warfare. It's designed to lower your blood pressure just enough so you don't have a stroke while you wait.
And every forty-five seconds, a voice cuts in to lie to me. "You are currently first in line. Please continue to hold."
I know you're lying. I can hear the other hold music in the background. There are at least twelve of us in this digital waiting room, staring at each other through the phone, too afraid to hang up because we'll lose our spot.
Finally, a human picks up. And the anxiety spikes. Now I have to perform. I have to be polite. I have to sound like a reasonable adult, even though I'm currently wearing sweatpants and eating cereal for dinner at 2 PM.
The agent says, "Thank you for calling. Can I get your account number?"
I give it to them.
"And for security, can you confirm your mother's maiden name?"
And I panic. Because I don't know that. I know her name is "Mom." I don't know what she was called before she was responsible for me. That feels like information she should have volunteered earlier.
Then comes my favorite phrase. The one that instills the most fear. "This call may be recorded for quality assurance."
Who is being graded here? Me? Is the agent going to get a bonus if I sound satisfied?
"Okay, Dave, I'm going to rate this call five stars, but only if you waive the late fee."
"I can't do that, sir."
"Then you're getting a one-star review, Dave. Your performance review is going to be a nightmare."
In the end, I didn't even solve the problem. I just realized that fifty dollars is cheaper than the emotional toll of staying on the line for another twenty minutes. So I hung up.
Now I just email them. Because nothing says "I value your business" like an automated reply that says, "We received your email. We will never read it."
(Comedian shrugs, waves, and walks off.)
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Disclaimer: The following is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is a creative simulation based on his known public speeches, writings, design philosophy, and management style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 context. It is not a real transcript.
Date: October 14, 2025 Location: A sunlit conference room at Apple Park, Cupertino. Subject: Steve Jobs (Simulated) Topic: The Future of Artificial Intelligence
Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for sitting down with us. It's 2025. AI is everywhere. It's writing code, painting pictures, diagnosing diseases. Some people call it the biggest revolution since the internet. What do you see?
Steve Jobs: (Leans forward, hands clasped, wearing the iconic black turtleneck. He pauses for a long moment, looking out the window.)
You're asking the wrong question. You're looking at the engine, not the car. Everyone is obsessed with the "intelligence." They talk about parameters, models, tokens. It's noise.
I don't care about the AI. I care about the human.
When we built the Mac, we didn't talk about the megahertz. We talked about what you could create. A bicycle for the mind. That's what this needs to be. If this "AI" is just a way to generate more spam, more noise, more mediocre content faster... then it's a failure. It's a bicycle that goes in circles.
Interviewer: So you view the current explosion of generative AI as clutter?
Jobs: (Chuckles softly) Clutter is the enemy. Look at the world today. You ask a machine a question, it gives you ten paragraphs. Who has time for that? Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
The technology of 2025... it's too loud. It wants you to know it's there. It says, "Look at me, I'm thinking!" That's arrogant. The best technology is invisible. It should be like electricity. You flip a switch, the light comes on. You don't ask the light bulb how it generated the photons.
AI should be the same. It shouldn't be a chatbot you talk to. It should be the silence between your thoughts that makes the next thought clearer. It should anticipate. It should remove the friction. If I have to prompt it, you've already lost.
Interviewer: There is a fear, though. Artists, writers, musicians—they feel threatened. They feel like the machine is stealing their soul.
Jobs: (His expression hardens slightly)
Technology alone is not enough. It's technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our heart sing.
An algorithm can mimic a Van Gogh. It can copy the brushstrokes. But it cannot copy the pain. It cannot copy the joy. It cannot copy the reason why Van Gogh painted.
If you use AI to replace your creativity, you are bankrupt. But if you use it to amplify your creativity... to handle the boring stuff so you can get to the insight... that is magic. We don't want tools that replace the artist. We want tools that make the artist dangerous. In a good way.
Interviewer: Privacy is a major concern. These models need data. Massive amounts of it.
Jobs: (Leans in, voice dropping lower, more intense)
Privacy is a fundamental human right. We said that years ago. It's even more true now.
Your thoughts, your voice, your images... that is your identity. If you have to send that to a server farm in another country to process a thought, you don't own your mind anymore. You're renting it.
The future isn't in the cloud. The future is here. (Taps the table) On the device. The silicon is powerful enough now. You should be able to be completely offline and have the full intelligence of your tools available to you. If you can't do that, you're building a surveillance machine, not a computer. We don't do that.
Interviewer: Where does this lead? Five years from now. What does the interface look like?
Jobs: There is no interface.
Interviewer: No screen?
Jobs: (Smiles) Eventually? Maybe. But I mean no barrier. Right now, you look at a screen to talk to the world. That's a separation.
The device should know context. It should know that when you are walking, you want brevity. When you are sitting, you want depth. It should know who you are talking to. It should filter the world for you, not just add to it.
We are moving from "computing" to "knowing." But the human must remain the master. The moment the machine starts making the decisions for you—what you read, what you buy, what you think—you are no longer a user. You are a pet.
We will not build pets. We build bicycles.
Interviewer: One last question. You told us to "Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish." In a world where the machine knows the answer before you ask the question... how do we stay foolish?
Jobs: (Long pause. He looks down at his hands, then back up, eyes bright.)
That is the challenge of your generation.
When the answer is cheap, the question becomes valuable. When the path is clear, the detour becomes essential. You have to work harder to be wrong. You have to fight the suggestion.
Don't let the machine optimize your life so much that there's no surprise left. Serendipity is not an algorithm. Keep getting lost. Keep making mistakes. That's where the magic is. The AI can give you the map. But you... you have to take the walk.
(He stands up, signaling the end of the conversation.)
Thank you.
Note: This simulation is an artistic interpretation intended to explore how Steve Jobs' design philosophy might apply to modern technological challenges.
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.
Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS
Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations
Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support
Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements