Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs QwQ 32B

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and QwQ 32B, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 40K, tested across 15 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or QwQ 32B?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and QwQ 32B are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 262K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and QwQ 32B

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by qwen while QwQ 32B is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
QwQ 32B
QwQ 32BRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
99%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
QwQ 32B
54%Vocabulary64%
14wSentence Length12w
0.39Hedging0.36
6.9Bold13.6
4.2Lists8.4
0.23Emoji0.00
0.93Headings0.00
0.17Transitions0.39
Based on 23 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwQ 32B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions