Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude Opus 4

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 by Qwen against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 1.0M vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Claude Opus 4?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 1000K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Claude Opus 4

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is made by qwen while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has a 1000K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is 31x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Claude Opus 4 uses 3.5x more sentence length

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Claude Opus 4
54%Vocabulary64%
18wSentence Length62w
0.51Hedging0.52
5.3Bold4.4
2.9Lists9.1
0.10Emoji0.11
0.75Headings1.87
0.09Transitions0.27
Based on 23 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Claude Opus 4

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions