Adversarial Contract Review

Important Disclaimer
I am not a lawyer, and the following material is for general informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and you should consult a qualified attorney licensed in the relevant jurisdiction before making any decisions or signing any agreement.

---

1. Overview of the Most Problematic Clauses

Clause	Why it can be “exploited” against the Contractor	Typical Legal Concerns
1. Scope – “Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation.”	Gives the client unilateral power to add work, potentially turning a fixed‑price or hourly engagement into an open‑ended, unpaid labor obligation.	Lack of “change‑order” or “price‑adjustment” mechanism; can be deemed unconscionable or unreasonable under many jurisdictions.
2. Payment – “Payment due within 90 days… Client may withhold payment if deliverables are deemed ‘unsatisfactory’ at Client’s sole discretion.”	90‑day payment window is unusually long and creates cash‑flow risk. The “sole discretion” standard makes the withholding clause effectively a penalty that can be abused.	May violate prompt‑payment statutes (e.g., many U.S. states require payment within 30‑45 days). The “sole discretion” standard may be deemed unreasonable or vague.
3. Intellectual Property – “All work product … shall be the exclusive property of Client … including any work created using Contractor’s pre‑existing IP.”	Strips the contractor of any rights to its own background technology, even if it is incorporated into the deliverables.	Can be over‑broad, potentially violating copyright and trade‑secret protections; may be unenforceable if it attempts to claim ownership of pre‑existing IP.
4. Non‑Compete – “24 months following termination, no similar services to any company in the same industry.”	A long, geographically unlimited non‑compete can effectively bar the contractor from earning a living in its field.	Many jurisdictions (e.g., California) void non‑competes for independent contractors; even where enforceable, the duration and scope must be reasonable (often ≤12 months, limited geography).
5. Termination – “Client may terminate at any time without notice; Contractor must provide 60‑day notice.”	Asymmetrical termination rights leave the contractor exposed to sudden loss of income while still being bound to give notice.	Imbalance may be seen as unfair contract term; the contractor’s notice requirement can be a penalty if the client can walk away instantly.
6. Liability – “Contractor assumes all liability for bugs, security vulnerabilities, or system failures … with no cap on liability.”	Unlimited liability can be financially ruinous, especially for a small consulting firm.	Courts often strike down or limit clauses that impose unlimited, uncapped liability for consequential damages; many jurisdictions require a reasonable cap (e.g., limited to fees paid).
7. Indemnification – “Contractor shall indemnify Client against all claims … regardless of fault.”	The contractor must pay for any claim, even if caused by the client’s own negligence.	Over‑broad indemnity clauses are frequently reduced by courts to the extent they are reasonable and fault‑based.
8. Confidentiality – “Do not disclose any information about this engagement … for 5 years after termination.”	Overly broad confidentiality can impede the contractor’s ability to showcase work, obtain references, or reuse generic methodologies.	Confidentiality should be limited to truly confidential information, not the existence of the contract itself, and should have a reasonable duration (often 2‑3 years).
9. Dispute Resolution – “Binding arbitration in Client’s home jurisdiction, costs borne by the losing party.”	Forces the contractor to arbitrate far from its own location, increasing expense, and the “losing party pays” rule can be punitive.	Many statutes (e.g., U.S. Federal Arbitration Act) allow parties to agree on arbitration, but unfair cost‑allocation clauses may be unconscionable.

---

2. Suggested Modifications (Clause‑by‑Clause)

Below are sample language changes that address the concerns while preserving the client’s legitimate interests. Tailor each to the governing law and the specific business relationship.

1. Scope

Original: “Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation.”
Proposed:

“Any change to the scope of services shall be documented in a written Change Order signed by both parties. If the change results in additional work, the parties shall agree in writing on the adjusted hourly rate or additional fixed fee. No additional compensation shall be required only for changes that do not materially increase the amount of work.”

Why: Introduces a mutual agreement mechanism and prevents unilateral, unpaid work.

2. Payment

Original: “Payment is due within 90 days of invoice receipt. Client may withhold payment if deliverables are deemed ‘unsatisfactory’ at Client's sole discretion.”
Proposed:

“Invoices shall be payable within 30 days of receipt. The Client may withhold payment only for specifically identified deliverables that fail to meet the written acceptance criteria set forth in Exhibit A. The Client shall provide a detailed written notice of any deficiency, and the Contractor shall have 10 business days to cure the issue before final payment is due.”

Why: Aligns with typical prompt‑payment statutes, adds an objective standard for “unsatisfactory,” and gives the contractor a cure period.

3. Intellectual Property

Original: “All work product … shall be the exclusive property of Client … including any work created using Contractor’s pre‑existing IP.”
Proposed:

“All new work product created specifically for the Client (the ‘Work Product’) shall be assigned to the Client. The Contractor retains all rights to its pre‑existing background IP and may use such background IP in the Work Product, provided that the Client receives a non‑exclusive, royalty‑free license to use the background IP solely as incorporated in the Work Product. Any third‑party components shall be subject to the appropriate licenses.”

Why: Protects the contractor’s background IP while granting the client necessary rights.

4. Non‑Compete

Original: “Contractor agrees not to provide similar services to any company in the same industry as Client for 24 months following termination.”
Proposed:

“The Contractor shall not solicit the Client’s active customers for a period of 12 months after termination. This restriction shall be limited to the geographic area where the Contractor performed services for the Client (e.g., the United States) and shall not prohibit the Contractor from providing services to other clients in the same industry.”

Why: Reduces duration and narrows scope to non‑solicitation, which is more likely to be enforceable.

5. Termination

Original: “Client may terminate this agreement at any time without notice. Contractor must provide 60 days written notice.”
Proposed:

“Either party may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written notice. In the event of termination by the Client, the Client shall pay for all Services performed up to the effective termination date, plus any reasonable wind‑down costs incurred by the Contractor. The Contractor may terminate upon 60 days written notice, provided the Contractor has fulfilled all outstanding deliverables or has transferred them to the Client in a usable form.”

Why: Balances termination rights and ensures the contractor is compensated for work already performed.

6. Liability

Original: “Contractor assumes all liability … with no cap on liability.”
Proposed:

“The Contractor’s total liability arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be limited to the total fees paid under this Agreement during the twelve (12) months preceding the claim, except for liability arising from gross negligence, willful misconduct, or breach of confidentiality. The Contractor shall not be liable for consequential, indirect, or punitive damages.”

Why: Introduces a reasonable cap and excludes extreme liability, which is standard in many service contracts.

7. Indemnification

Original: “Contractor shall indemnify Client against all claims … regardless of fault.”
Proposed:

“The Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Client from any third‑party claims arising directly from the Contractor’s breach of this Agreement, gross negligence, or willful misconduct. The Client shall indemnify the Contractor for claims arising from the Client’s own negligence or breach.”

Why: Makes indemnity fault‑based and mutual, limiting exposure.

8. Confidentiality

Original: “Contractor shall not disclose any information about this engagement … for 5 years after termination.”
Proposed:

“The Contractor shall keep confidential all non‑public, proprietary information disclosed by the Client, including technical data, business plans, and trade secrets. This obligation shall survive for three (3) years after termination. The Contractor may disclose the existence of the relationship and general nature of services for the purpose of marketing, provided no confidential details are revealed.”

Why: Narrows the definition of “confidential information” and reduces the duration to a more typical period.

9. Dispute Resolution

Original: “Binding arbitration in Client’s home jurisdiction, with costs borne by the losing party.”
Proposed:

“Any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be resolved by binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association (AAA) under its Commercial Arbitration Rules. The arbitration shall be conducted in a neutral location agreed upon by the parties (or, if no agreement, in the contractor’s principal place of business). Each party shall bear its own costs, and the arbitrator may award reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.”

Why: Provides a neutral venue, shares costs more equitably, and aligns with common arbitration practices.

---

3. Legal Reasoning Behind the Recommendations

1. Balance of Power – Contracts that heavily favor one party can be deemed unconscionable or void for being a penalty. Courts often strike down clauses that are overly one‑sided, especially when the weaker party has little bargaining power.

2. Reasonableness Standard – Most jurisdictions apply a reasonableness test to non‑compete, liability, and indemnity clauses. A clause that is excessively broad, long‑duration, or unlimited is likely to be reduced or invalidated.

3. Prompt‑Payment Statutes – Many states (e.g., California, New York, Texas) have statutes requiring payment within 30–45 days. A 90‑day term may be illegal or expose the client to penalties.

4. Intellectual Property Protection – The contractor’s background IP is a valuable asset. Assigning all rights to the client, including pre‑existing tools, can be unfair and may violate copyright law (the client cannot claim ownership of the contractor’s pre‑existing works).

5. Contractual Notice Requirements – Asymmetrical notice periods can be viewed as penal. Courts often require mutual notice provisions to avoid unfair surprise.

6. Liability Caps – Unlimited liability for consequential damages is rarely enforceable. A cap tied to fees is a common, enforceable compromise.

7. Indemnity Scope – Indemnities that are unconditional (i.e., “regardless of fault”) are often narrowed by courts to the extent they are reasonable and fault‑based.

8. Confidentiality Scope – Confidentiality should protect true secrets, not the mere fact that a contract exists. Over‑broad confidentiality can be unreasonable and may be struck down.

9. Arbitration Venue & Costs – Forcing arbitration in the client’s home jurisdiction can be unduly burdensome. A neutral venue and fair cost allocation increase enforceability and reduce the risk of a court deeming the clause unconscionable.

---

4. Practical Steps for the Contractor

1. Engage Legal Counsel – Have an attorney review the entire agreement and negotiate the above modifications (or similar language) before signing.
2. Document Change Orders – Keep a written log of any scope changes, approvals, and associated fee adjustments.
3. Maintain Records of Background IP – Provide a schedule of pre‑existing tools, libraries, or methodologies you intend to use; attach it as an exhibit to the contract.
4. Set Acceptance Criteria – Define clear, written acceptance criteria for each deliverable to avoid “sole discretion” disputes.
5. Negotiate Payment Terms – Aim for a 30‑day net term and a prompt‑payment discount (e.g., 2 % for payment within 10 days) to improve cash flow.
6. Clarify Termination Obligations – Agree on a transition plan (e.g., hand‑off of code, documentation) and any wind‑down compensation.
7. Obtain Insurance – Consider professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance with limits that align with any liability cap you negotiate.
8. Review State‑Specific Laws – Some states (e.g., California) have statutory prohibitions on non‑competes for independent contractors; ensure compliance.

---

Bottom Line

The contract, as written, contains several clauses that could leave a contractor financially exposed, unable to work in their field, or subject to unilateral, unpaid demands. By inserting mutual change‑order procedures, reasonable payment and acceptance standards, IP safeguards, balanced non‑compete and termination provisions, liability caps, fault‑based indemnities, narrowed confidentiality, and fair arbitration terms, the agreement becomes more equitable and more likely to be enforceable under typical U.S. contract law.

Again, consult a qualified attorney to tailor these suggestions to the governing law, the specific industry, and the particular business relationship you have with the client.