Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) compares on this challenge:

  • Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Estimate Complexity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet's response to the Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
February 26, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)
Response

claude-3.5-sonnet logo
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)Estimate Complexity
claude-3.5-sonnet logo
Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

I'll help you estimate the FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 from first principles. Let's break this down step by step.

  1. Model Architecture Parameters
  • GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters
  • Uses transformer architecture with attention mechanism
  • Training involves forward pass, backward pass, and optimizer updates
  1. Key Components per Token For each token in the sequence, we need to calculate:

a) Self-Attention

  • Query, Key, Value projections: 3 × (n_emb × n_emb)
  • Attention scores: n_seq × n_seq × n_emb
  • Attention output: n_seq × n_emb × n_emb
  • For h=96 attention heads

b) Feed-Forward Network (FFN)

  • Two linear transformations
  • First projection: n_emb × (4 × n_emb)
  • Second projection: (4 × n_emb) × n_emb
  • GELU activations
  1. Training Details
  • Context length: 2048 tokens
  • Batch size: ~1.5M tokens per batch (approximate)
  • Training tokens: ~300B tokens
  1. FLOPs Calculation

Let's calculate for one forward pass through a single token:

a) Self-Attention FLOPs

  • QKV projections: 3 × (12288 × 12288) = ~450M FLOPs
  • Attention scores: 2048 × 2048 × 12288 = ~50B FLOPs
  • Attention output: 2048 × 12288 × 12288 = ~300B FLOPs
  • Multiply by 96 heads: ~35T FLOPs

b) FFN FLOPs

  • First projection: 12288 × 49152 = ~600M FLOPs
  • Second projection: 49152 × 12288 = ~600M FLOPs
  • Total FFN: ~1.2B FLOPs

c) Per Token Total

  • Forward pass: ~36T FLOPs
  • Backward pass (roughly 2x forward): ~72T FLOPs
  • Parameter updates (1x forward): ~36T FLOPs
  • Total per token: ~144T FLOPs
  1. Total Training FLOPs
  • Number of tokens: 300B
  • FLOPs per token: 144T
  • Total FLOPs: 300B × 144T = ~43,200 Zettaflops (4.32 × 10^22 FLOPs)

This is a rough estimate that considers:

  • Main computational bottlenecks
  • Both forward and backward passes
  • Parameter updates
  • Major attention and FFN operations

The actual number might be higher due to:

  • Additional layer normalizations
  • Activation functions
  • Memory access operations
  • Optimizer-specific computations (Adam)
  • Various other overhead operations

This estimate aligns with the general understanding that training large language models requires enormous computational resources, in the order of zettaflops of compute.

Note: This is an approximation based on the model's known architecture and typical training procedures. The actual number could vary based on specific implementation details, optimizations, and hardware-specific considerations.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningAnalysisSummarization

Categories

TextVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2024-06-01
Size
LARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
200,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival