Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude Opus 4.6
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how Claude Opus 4.6 compares on this challenge:

  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude Opus 4.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude Opus 4.6

Mini LBO Underwrite

Claude Opus 4 6's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

Claude Opus 4.6
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

Claude Opus 4.6
Response

claude-opus-4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.6Mini LBO Underwrite
claude-opus-4.6 logo
Claude Opus 4.6

HarborTech Services – LBO Underwriting Memo


SOURCES & USES

Uses:

ItemAmount
Enterprise Value (12.0x × $120m)$1,440.0m
Transaction Fees (2.0% × $1,440m)$28.8m
Total Uses$1,468.8m

Sources:

ItemMultipleAmount
Term Loan (4.0x)4.0x$480.0m
Mezzanine (1.5x)1.5x$180.0m
Total Debt5.5x$660.0m
Equity$808.8m
Total Sources$1,468.8m

1) YEAR-BY-YEAR MODEL (FY2026–FY2030)

Revenue & EBITDA

FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue Growth8.0%7.0%6.0%5.0%5.0%
Revenue$972.0m$1,040.0m$1,102.5m$1,157.6m$1,215.5m
EBITDA Margin14.0%15.0%16.0%16.5%17.0%
EBITDA$136.1m$156.0m$176.4m$191.0m$206.6m

(Revenue: 900×1.08=972.0; 972×1.07=1,040.04→1,040.0; 1,040.04×1.06=1,102.44→1,102.5; 1,102.44×1.05=1,157.57→1,157.6; 1,157.57×1.05=1,215.44→1,215.5)

Debt Balances & Interest – Detailed Walkthrough

Term Loan (TL): 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual mandatory amortization on original principal ($4.8m/yr), plus optional paydown from excess FCF.

Mezzanine: 12.0% cash interest on BoP balance, 2.0% PIK accrues to principal. No amortization; repaid at exit.

I'll compute each year sequentially since TL balance depends on prior-year optional paydown, and Mezz balance compounds with PIK.


FY2026

Debt balances (BoP): TL = $480.0m, Mezz = $180.0m

Cash Interest:

  • TL: $480.0m × 9.0% = $43.20m
  • Mezz: $180.0m × 12.0% = $21.60m
  • Total Cash Interest = $64.80m

PIK accrual on Mezz: $180.0m × 2.0% = $3.60m

Cash Taxes: 25% × max(0, EBITDA − Total Cash Interest) = 25% × ($136.08 − $64.80) = 25% × $71.28 = $17.82m

Capex: 3.0% × $972.0 = $29.16m

ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($972.0 − $900.0) = 0.5% × $72.0 = $0.36m

Free Cash Flow (before debt paydown): $$FCF = EBITDA - Cash\ Interest - Cash\ Taxes - Capex - \Delta NWC$$ $$= 136.08 - 64.80 - 17.82 - 29.16 - 0.36 = $23.94m$$

Mandatory TL Amortization: $480.0 × 1.0% = $4.80m

FCF after mandatory amort (available for optional paydown): $23.94 − $4.80 = $19.14m → all applied to TL

EoP Balances:

  • TL: $480.0 − $4.80 − $19.14 = $456.06m
  • Mezz: $180.0 + $3.60 = $183.60m
  • Total Debt = $639.66m

FY2027

BoP: TL = $456.06m, Mezz = $183.60m

Cash Interest:

  • TL: $456.06 × 9.0% = $41.05m
  • Mezz: $183.60 × 12.0% = $22.03m
  • Total = $63.08m

PIK: $183.60 × 2.0% = $3.67m

Cash Taxes: 25% × ($156.01 − $63.08) = 25% × $92.93 = $23.23m

(EBITDA: 1,040.04 × 15% = $156.01m)

Capex: 3.0% × $1,040.04 = $31.20m

ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,040.04 − $972.0) = 0.5% × $68.04 = $0.34m

FCF: $156.01 − $63.08 − $23.23 − $31.20 − $0.34 = $38.16m

Mandatory TL Amort: $4.80m

Optional paydown: $38.16 − $4.80 = $33.36m

EoP Balances:

  • TL: $456.06 − $4.80 − $33.36 = $417.90m
  • Mezz: $183.60 + $3.67 = $187.27m
  • Total Debt = $605.17m

FY2028

BoP: TL = $417.90m, Mezz = $187.27m

Cash Interest:

  • TL: $417.90 × 9.0% = $37.61m
  • Mezz: $187.27 × 12.0% = $22.47m
  • Total = $60.08m

PIK: $187.27 × 2.0% = $3.75m

(EBITDA: 1,102.44 × 16% = $176.39m)

Cash Taxes: 25% × ($176.39 − $60.08) = 25% × $116.31 = $29.08m

Capex: 3.0% × $1,102.44 = $33.07m

ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,102.44 − $1,040.04) = 0.5% × $62.40 = $0.31m

FCF: $176.39 − $60.08 − $29.08 − $33.07 − $0.31 = $53.85m

Mandatory TL Amort: $4.80m

Optional paydown: $53.85 − $4.80 = $49.05m

EoP Balances:

  • TL: $417.90 − $4.80 − $49.05 = $364.05m
  • Mezz: $187.27 + $3.75 = $191.02m
  • Total Debt = $555.07m

FY2029

BoP: TL = $364.05m, Mezz = $191.02m

Cash Interest:

  • TL: $364.05 × 9.0% = $32.76m
  • Mezz: $191.02 × 12.0% = $22.92m
  • Total = $55.69m

PIK: $191.02 × 2.0% = $3.82m

(EBITDA: 1,157.57 × 16.5% = $191.00m)

Cash Taxes: 25% × ($191.00 − $55.69) = 25% × $135.31 = $33.83m

Capex: 3.0% × $1,157.57 = $34.73m

ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,157.57 − $1,102.44) = 0.5% × $55.12 = $0.28m

FCF: $191.00 − $55.69 − $33.83 − $34.73 − $0.28 = $66.48m

Mandatory TL Amort: $4.80m

Optional paydown: $66.48 − $4.80 = $61.68m

EoP Balances:

  • TL: $364.05 − $4.80 − $61.68 = $297.57m
  • Mezz: $191.02 + $3.82 = $194.84m
  • Total Debt = $492.41m

FY2030

BoP: TL = $297.57m, Mezz = $194.84m

Cash Interest:

  • TL: $297.57 × 9.0% = $26.78m
  • Mezz: $194.84 × 12.0% = $23.38m
  • Total = $50.16m

PIK: $194.84 × 2.0% = $3.90m

(EBITDA: 1,215.45 × 17% = $206.63m)

Cash Taxes: 25% × ($206.63 − $50.16) = 25% × $156.47 = $39.12m

Capex: 3.0% × $1,215.45 = $36.46m

ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,215.45 − $1,157.57) = 0.5% × $57.88 = $0.29m

FCF: $206.63 − $50.16 − $39.12 − $36.46 − $0.29 = $80.59m

Mandatory TL Amort: $4.80m

Optional paydown: $80.59 − $4.80 = $75.79m

EoP Balances:

  • TL: $297.57 − $4.80 − $75.79 = $216.98m
  • Mezz: $194.84 + $3.90 = $198.74m
  • Total Debt = $415.72m

SUMMARY TABLE

FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue972.01,040.01,102.41,157.61,215.5
EBITDA136.1156.0176.4191.0206.6
TL Cash Interest(43.2)(41.0)(37.6)(32.8)(26.8)
Mezz Cash Interest(21.6)(22.0)(22.5)(22.9)(23.4)
Total Cash Interest(64.8)(63.1)(60.1)(55.7)(50.2)
Cash Taxes(17.8)(23.2)(29.1)(33.8)(39.1)
Capex(29.2)(31.2)(33.1)(34.7)(36.5)
ΔNWC(0.4)(0.3)(0.3)(0.3)(0.3)
FCF (pre-paydown)23.938.253.966.580.6
Mandatory Amort(4.8)(4.8)(4.8)(4.8)(4.8)
Optional TL Paydown(19.1)(33.4)(49.1)(61.7)(75.8)
EoP Term Loan456.1417.9364.1297.6217.0
EoP Mezzanine183.6187.3191.0194.8198.7
Total Debt639.7605.2555.1492.4415.7
Leverage (Total Debt / EBITDA)4.7x3.9x3.1x2.6x2.0x

2) EQUITY IRR & MOIC

Exit Proceeds (End of FY2030)

ItemAmount
FY2030 EBITDA$206.6m
Exit Multiple10.5x
Enterprise Value$2,169.6m
Less: Exit Fees (1.0%)($21.7m)
Less: Term Loan Repayment($217.0m)
Less: Mezzanine Repayment (incl. PIK)($198.7m)
Equity Proceeds$1,732.2m

Returns

$$MOIC = \frac{$1,732.2m}{$808.8m} = \textbf{2.14x}$$

$$IRR: \quad 808.8 \times (1 + IRR)^5 = 1,732.2$$

$$(1 + IRR)^5 = 2.1417$$

$$IRR = 2.1417^{0.2} - 1$$

$$\ln(2.1417) = 0.7630 \implies 0.2 \times 0.7630 = 0.15260 \implies e^{0.15260} = 1.1650$$

$$\boxed{IRR \approx 16.5%}$$

$$\boxed{MOIC \approx 2.14x}$$


3) SENSITIVITY TABLE: EQUITY IRR

To build the sensitivity, I vary exit EBITDA margin in FY2030 (holding FY2030 revenue at $1,215.5m constant, and holding all prior years and debt balances unchanged — the margin change only affects exit-year EBITDA for valuation purposes).

FY2030 EBITDA at each margin:

  • 16.0%: $1,215.5 × 16.0% = $194.5m
  • 17.0%: $1,215.5 × 17.0% = $206.6m (base)
  • 18.0%: $1,215.5 × 18.0% = $218.8m

Debt at exit (constant): TL $217.0m + Mezz $198.7m = $415.7m

**

Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude Opus 4.6

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2026-02-04
Size
XLARGE
Context
1,000,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival