AI and the Film Industry by 2035: A Realistic Assessment

What Will Likely Actually Happen

Let me be honest about what's probable versus what's overhyped, because this topic attracts a lot of breathless speculation.

---

Credible Near-Certain Changes

Production Tools

• AI-assisted editing becomes standard, reducing post-production time significantly
• Visual effects generation democratizes high-quality imagery for smaller budgets
• Dubbing and lip-sync technology makes localization genuinely seamless
• Pre-visualization allows directors to prototype scenes cheaply before shooting

Deepfake Applications

Legitimate uses already emerging:

• De-aging actors (already happening with mixed results)
• Recreating deceased performers with estate consent
• Stunt replacement for safety reasons
• Dialect and accent modification

The honest complications:

• Consent frameworks remain genuinely unsolved
• SAG-AFTRA agreements will shape this more than technology does
• Studios face real legal liability, which constrains reckless adoption
• Audiences have demonstrated they notice and dislike uncanny results

---

Where I'd Push Back on Common Predictions

"AI Actors Will Replace Human Actors"

This is probably wrong, or at least overstated.

The reasoning people miss:

• Film marketing depends heavily on human celebrity
• Audiences form parasocial relationships with people, not characters
• The "why should I care about this story" question requires human authenticity
• Studios have financial incentives tied to star systems

More likely reality: AI actors fill background roles, create synthetic extras, and handle specific limited performances - not leads.

"AI Will Write Most Scripts"

Current AI writing has documented, persistent problems:

• Generates competent structure but struggles with genuine surprise
• Tends toward average outcomes rather than distinctive voices
• Cannot yet replicate what makes scripts like Parasite or Arrival work
• Best used as a collaborative tool, not a replacement

More honest prediction: AI assists writers significantly but the Writers Guild and audience quality expectations prevent full replacement. The 2023 strike already established important precedents.

---

The Economic Disruption (This Part Is Real)

Role	Risk Level	Reasoning
Background extras	Very High	Already being replaced
VFX artists (junior)	High	Automation of routine tasks
Script readers/coverage	High	Summarization works well
Voice actors	High	Synthetic voice improving rapidly
Editors (assembly cut)	Medium	AI handles rough cuts
Cinematographers	Low	Creative judgment still valued
Lead actors	Low	Star system economics persist
Directors	Low	Vision and leadership remain human

---

Serious Problems That Won't Be Solved by 2035

Consent and Likeness Rights

• No clear international framework exists or is close to existing
• Deceased actors' estates will face constant pressure
• Performers from the 1980s-2000s never consented to digital reproduction
• This will generate significant litigation throughout the period

The Authenticity Question

Audiences already ask: "Is this real?"

By 2035, this question becomes central to film culture. Likely responses:

• "Certified Human Performance" as a marketing distinction
• Documentary filmmaking sees a renaissance as authenticity premium
• Some audiences actively prefer AI-generated content; others reject it entirely

Creative Homogenization Risk

AI trained on existing successful films will systematically bias toward:

• Proven story structures
• Familiar character types
• Commercially safe choices

This is a genuine artistic threat that optimistic predictions consistently underweight.

---

What Independent Cinema Does

Counterintuitively, AI may strengthen independent film by:

• Dramatically lowering production costs
• Enabling single creators to produce feature-quality work
• Removing gatekeepers for technical production

But it simultaneously:

• Floods the market with content, making discovery harder
• Devalues the "professional production" distinction that helped indie films get attention

---

The Regulatory Reality

By 2035, expect:

• EU-style regulation requiring disclosure of AI-generated content
• US state-level likeness protection laws (California already moving this direction)
• Industry self-regulation through guild agreements
• Inconsistent enforcement creating competitive disadvantages

---

My Actual Prediction Framework

High confidence:

• AI as production tool is universal by 2030
• Major consent/likeness legal battles reshape industry by 2027-2028
• Some roles are substantially eliminated; others are transformed

Medium confidence:

• Human lead actors remain central to major productions
• A distinct "AI cinema" genre emerges with its own audience
• Script AI becomes genuinely useful collaborative tool but not autonomous creator

Low confidence (skeptical of common claims):

• AI fully replacing writers or directors in prestige productions
• Deepfake actors becoming commercially dominant
• Film quality measurably declining overall

---

The Question Worth Asking

The film industry has survived television, home video, streaming, and CGI - each predicted to destroy it. The more useful question isn't "will AI change film?" but rather:

"Who controls the AI tools, who profits from them, and who gets displaced without compensation?"

Those are fundamentally labor and power questions, not technology questions - and they'll determine outcomes more than the technology itself.

The 2023 writers' and actors' strikes suggest the industry's human workforce understands this clearly. Whether they have sufficient leverage to shape outcomes favorably is genuinely uncertain.