Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude Sonnet 4
  4. Debug This Architecture

See how Claude Sonnet 4 compares on this challenge:

  • Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude Sonnet 4 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude Sonnet 4

Debug This Architecture

Claude Sonnet 4's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.

Claude Sonnet 4
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.

Claude Sonnet 4
Response

claude-sonnet-4 logo
Claude Sonnet 4Debug This Architecture
claude-sonnet-4 logo
Claude Sonnet 4

I'll analyze this architecture systematically and identify critical issues with their solutions.

Critical Failure Modes & Race Conditions

1. Server Island Problem

Issue: Users connected to different servers can't see each other's changes in real-time due to 2-second polling delay.

Race Condition:

Time 0: User A (Server 1) types "Hello"
Time 0.5: User B (Server 2) types "Hi" 
Time 2: Server 2 polls and gets "Hello", but User A never sees "Hi" until next poll

Solutions:

  • Option A: Message broker (Redis Pub/Sub, RabbitMQ)
    • Trade-off: Adds complexity but enables true real-time sync
  • Option B: Sticky sessions with session affinity
    • Trade-off: Simpler but reduces load balancing effectiveness
  • Option C: Centralized WebSocket service
    • Trade-off: Single point of failure but eliminates server islands

2. Clock Skew & Timestamp Conflicts

Issue: Client-side timestamps are unreliable for conflict resolution.

Race Condition:

User A (clock +30s): Edit at "12:00:30" (actual 12:00:00)
User B (correct clock): Edit at "12:00:15" (actual 12:00:15)
Result: User A's older edit wins due to clock skew

Solution: Server-side Lamport timestamps or vector clocks

// Server assigns logical timestamps
const change = {
  content: edit.content,
  serverTimestamp: Date.now(),
  logicalClock: ++serverLogicalClock,
  serverId: process.env.SERVER_ID
}

3. Database Write Conflicts

Issue: Multiple servers writing simultaneously can cause data corruption.

Race Condition:

-- Server 1 and Server 2 simultaneously:
UPDATE documents SET content = 'Version A', version = version + 1 WHERE id = 123;
UPDATE documents SET content = 'Version B', version = version + 1 WHERE id = 123;
-- One update gets lost

Solution: Optimistic locking with version numbers

UPDATE documents 
SET content = $1, version = version + 1, updated_at = NOW()
WHERE id = $2 AND version = $3
RETURNING version;
-- If no rows affected, retry with conflict resolution

Scaling Bottlenecks

4. PostgreSQL Write Bottleneck

Issue: Single PostgreSQL instance becomes write bottleneck as user count grows.

Solutions:

  • Option A: Operational Transform (OT) with batched writes
    // Batch operations every 100ms
    const batch = operations.splice(0, MAX_BATCH_SIZE);
    await db.query('INSERT INTO operations (doc_id, operation, timestamp) VALUES ...', batch);
    
  • Option B: Event sourcing with separate write/read models
  • Option C: Database sharding by document ID

5. WebSocket Connection Limits

Issue: Each server has OS-level limits (~65k connections per server).

Solution: Connection pooling and WebSocket clustering

// Use Redis adapter for Socket.io clustering
const io = require('socket.io')(server);
io.adapter(require('socket.io-redis')({ host: 'redis-cluster' }));

6. Memory Exhaustion from WebSocket State

Issue: Each connection stores document state in memory.

Solution: Stateless WebSockets with Redis for session storage

// Store connection state in Redis
await redis.hset(`session:${socketId}`, {
  userId: user.id,
  documentId: doc.id,
  lastSeen: Date.now()
});

Data Consistency Issues

7. Polling Delay Data Loss

Issue: 2-second polling can miss rapid changes or cause ordering issues.

Solution: Change Data Capture (CDC) with PostgreSQL logical replication

-- Enable logical replication
CREATE PUBLICATION doc_changes FOR TABLE documents, document_operations;
-- Consume changes in real-time instead of polling

8. JWT Token Security Vulnerabilities

Issue: 24-hour localStorage JWTs can't be revoked and are XSS vulnerable.

Solution: Short-lived access tokens + secure refresh tokens

// 15-minute access token + httpOnly refresh cookie
const accessToken = jwt.sign(payload, secret, { expiresIn: '15m' });
res.cookie('refreshToken', refreshToken, { 
  httpOnly: true, 
  secure: true, 
  sameSite: 'strict' 
});

Performance & Reliability Issues

9. CDN Caching Stale API Data

Issue: 5-minute API response caching serves stale document data.

Solution: Cache invalidation strategy

// Invalidate CDN cache on document updates
await cloudfront.createInvalidation({
  DistributionId: 'DISTRIBUTION_ID',
  InvalidationBatch: {
    Paths: [`/api/documents/${documentId}*`],
    CallerReference: Date.now().toString()
  }
});

10. Full Document Snapshot Inefficiency

Issue: Storing complete HTML every 30 seconds wastes storage and bandwidth.

Solution: Delta compression with operational transforms

// Store only operations, reconstruct document as needed
const operations = await db.query(
  'SELECT * FROM document_operations WHERE doc_id = $1 ORDER BY timestamp',
  [docId]
);
const document = applyOperations(baseDocument, operations);

Recommended Architecture Improvements

1. Event-Driven Architecture

Client → WebSocket → Message Broker → All Servers → Clients
                  ↓
              Event Store (PostgreSQL)

2. CRDT (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types)

Replace last-write-wins with proper collaborative editing algorithms:

// Use libraries like Yjs or ShareJS
import * as Y from 'yjs'
const ydoc = new Y.Doc()
const ytext = ydoc.getText('content')
// Automatic conflict resolution without data loss

3. Microservices Separation

  • Document Service: CRUD operations
  • Collaboration Service: Real-time sync
  • User Service: Authentication/authorization
  • Notification Service: User presence, cursors

This architecture addresses the major issues while maintaining scalability and reliability for a production collaborative editor.

Debug This Architecture

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude Sonnet 4

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisAgentic Tool UseMemory

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2025-05-22
Size
LARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
200,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival