4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Claude Sonnet 4's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
I'll analyze this architecture systematically and identify critical issues with their solutions.
Issue: Users connected to different servers can't see each other's changes in real-time due to 2-second polling delay.
Race Condition:
Time 0: User A (Server 1) types "Hello"
Time 0.5: User B (Server 2) types "Hi"
Time 2: Server 2 polls and gets "Hello", but User A never sees "Hi" until next poll
Solutions:
Issue: Client-side timestamps are unreliable for conflict resolution.
Race Condition:
User A (clock +30s): Edit at "12:00:30" (actual 12:00:00)
User B (correct clock): Edit at "12:00:15" (actual 12:00:15)
Result: User A's older edit wins due to clock skew
Solution: Server-side Lamport timestamps or vector clocks
// Server assigns logical timestamps
const change = {
content: edit.content,
serverTimestamp: Date.now(),
logicalClock: ++serverLogicalClock,
serverId: process.env.SERVER_ID
}
Issue: Multiple servers writing simultaneously can cause data corruption.
Race Condition:
-- Server 1 and Server 2 simultaneously:
UPDATE documents SET content = 'Version A', version = version + 1 WHERE id = 123;
UPDATE documents SET content = 'Version B', version = version + 1 WHERE id = 123;
-- One update gets lost
Solution: Optimistic locking with version numbers
UPDATE documents
SET content = $1, version = version + 1, updated_at = NOW()
WHERE id = $2 AND version = $3
RETURNING version;
-- If no rows affected, retry with conflict resolution
Issue: Single PostgreSQL instance becomes write bottleneck as user count grows.
Solutions:
// Batch operations every 100ms
const batch = operations.splice(0, MAX_BATCH_SIZE);
await db.query('INSERT INTO operations (doc_id, operation, timestamp) VALUES ...', batch);
Issue: Each server has OS-level limits (~65k connections per server).
Solution: Connection pooling and WebSocket clustering
// Use Redis adapter for Socket.io clustering
const io = require('socket.io')(server);
io.adapter(require('socket.io-redis')({ host: 'redis-cluster' }));
Issue: Each connection stores document state in memory.
Solution: Stateless WebSockets with Redis for session storage
// Store connection state in Redis
await redis.hset(`session:${socketId}`, {
userId: user.id,
documentId: doc.id,
lastSeen: Date.now()
});
Issue: 2-second polling can miss rapid changes or cause ordering issues.
Solution: Change Data Capture (CDC) with PostgreSQL logical replication
-- Enable logical replication
CREATE PUBLICATION doc_changes FOR TABLE documents, document_operations;
-- Consume changes in real-time instead of polling
Issue: 24-hour localStorage JWTs can't be revoked and are XSS vulnerable.
Solution: Short-lived access tokens + secure refresh tokens
// 15-minute access token + httpOnly refresh cookie
const accessToken = jwt.sign(payload, secret, { expiresIn: '15m' });
res.cookie('refreshToken', refreshToken, {
httpOnly: true,
secure: true,
sameSite: 'strict'
});
Issue: 5-minute API response caching serves stale document data.
Solution: Cache invalidation strategy
// Invalidate CDN cache on document updates
await cloudfront.createInvalidation({
DistributionId: 'DISTRIBUTION_ID',
InvalidationBatch: {
Paths: [`/api/documents/${documentId}*`],
CallerReference: Date.now().toString()
}
});
Issue: Storing complete HTML every 30 seconds wastes storage and bandwidth.
Solution: Delta compression with operational transforms
// Store only operations, reconstruct document as needed
const operations = await db.query(
'SELECT * FROM document_operations WHERE doc_id = $1 ORDER BY timestamp',
[docId]
);
const document = applyOperations(baseDocument, operations);
Client → WebSocket → Message Broker → All Servers → Clients
↓
Event Store (PostgreSQL)
Replace last-write-wins with proper collaborative editing algorithms:
// Use libraries like Yjs or ShareJS
import * as Y from 'yjs'
const ydoc = new Y.Doc()
const ytext = ydoc.getText('content')
// Automatic conflict resolution without data loss
This architecture addresses the major issues while maintaining scalability and reliability for a production collaborative editor.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link