4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Deepseek V3 03 24's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
Here’s a comprehensive analysis of potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in your architecture, along with proposed solutions and trade-offs:
Problem: Clients connected to different API servers won’t receive real-time updates from each other due to isolated WebSocket connections per server. Polling PostgreSQL every 2 seconds introduces latency (up to 2s sync delay).
Solution:
Problem: Client clocks are unreliable (can drift or be maliciously set), leading to data loss if a stale edit has a later timestamp.
Solution:
Problem: Polling every 2s scales poorly (N servers × M documents → high DB load).
Solution:
Problem: Storage bloat (especially for large documents) and expensive snapshotting under high load.
Solution:
Problem: Storing JWTs in localStorage makes them vulnerable to XSS attacks.
Solution:
Problem: Stale document data if cached API responses don’t reflect real-time edits.
Solution:
Problem: High write load during peak editing (all changes hit the primary DB).
Solution:
Problem: A single server handling too many WebSocket connections (memory/CPU limits).
Solution:
Problem: If WebSockets fail, the UI may freeze (no fallback).
Solution:
Problem: Hot partitions if some orgs are much more active.
Solution:
Problem: Session cache loss if Redis fails.
Solution:
Each solution balances performance, complexity, and reliability. The highest-priority fixes are WebSocket fragmentation (Pub/Sub) and LWW conflicts (server timestamps).
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link