4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Deepseek V3 2 Exp's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
Issue: Each server only broadcasts to its own WebSocket clients → users connected to different servers won't see real-time updates from each other.
Solution: Use Redis Pub/Sub for cross-server WebSocket broadcasting
// When server receives change:
redis.publish(`doc:${docId}`, changeEvent);
// All servers subscribe to channel:
redis.subscribe(`doc:${docId}`, (change) => broadcastToLocalClients(change));
Trade-off: Adds network hop latency (~1-2ms), requires Redis cluster for high availability
Issue: Last-write-wins using client timestamps is fundamentally broken
Solution: Use server-generated monotonic sequence numbers
-- PostgreSQL sequence per document:
CREATE SEQUENCE doc_123_version_seq;
-- Each change: nextval('doc_123_version_seq')
Trade-off: Requires database round-trip before broadcasting (~5-10ms added latency)
Issue: 2-second polling interval across all servers will overwhelm database at scale
Solution: Replace polling with PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY
-- Server listens for document changes:
LISTEN doc_changes_123;
-- On change:
NOTIFY doc_changes_123, '{"version": 456}';
Trade-off: PostgreSQL connection limit (~500-1000 connections), requires connection pooling strategy
Issue: Saving entire document every 30 seconds wastes storage/bandwidth
Solution: Operational Transform (OT) or Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs)
// Store operations instead of full HTML:
{
"op": "insert",
"pos": 42,
"text": "new text",
"version": 123
}
Trade-off: Complex implementation, requires operation history cleanup strategy
Issue: localStorage vulnerable to XSS attacks
Solution: HttpOnly cookies + CSRF tokens
httpOnly; secure; sameSite=strict flags// Frontend includes CSRF token in headers
axios.defaults.headers.common['X-CSRF-Token'] = getCSRFToken();
Trade-off: More complex auth flow, requires sticky sessions or JWT in cookies
Issue: Caching API responses for 5 minutes breaks real-time collaboration
Solution:
Cache-Control: no-storeIf-None-Match: "version123"Issue: Server crash loses all WebSocket connections
Solution:
// Client-side reconnection:
function reconnect() {
const delay = Math.min(1000 * 2 ** attempts, 30000);
setTimeout(connectWebSocket, delay);
}
Trade-off: Sticky sessions reduce load distribution effectiveness
Issue: Partitioning only by organization ID leads to hotspots
Solution: Composite partitioning key
-- Partition by (organization_id, document_id_hash)
PARTITION BY HASH((organization_id::text || document_id::text)::uuid)
Trade-off: More complex queries for cross-organization operations (admin views)
Issue: Last-write-wins loses intermediate changes
Solution: Implement Operational Transform (OT) with central server sequencing
// Server as single sequencer:
class OTServer {
applyOperation(doc, operation) {
const transformed = OT.transform(operation, this.pendingOps);
this.history.push(transformed);
return transformed;
}
}
Trade-off: Significant implementation complexity, requires undo/redo handling
Issue: Single points of failure in each component
Solution: Multi-AZ deployment with failover
Component Redundancy Strategy
------------- --------------------
PostgreSQL Multi-AZ RDS with read replicas
Redis Redis Cluster (6 nodes, 3 master/3 slave)
WebSocket Redis Pub/Sub + auto-scaling group
Load Balancer Multi-AZ ALB/NLB
Trade-off: 2-3x higher infrastructure cost
Issue: No visibility into system health
Solution: Implement observability stack
# SLO example:
availability: 99.95% over 30 days
latency: p95 < 200ms for document operations
Trade-off: Operational overhead, but essential for production
Immediate Fixes (Week 1):
Short-term (Month 1):
Long-term (Quarter 1):
This architecture can support ~10,000 concurrent editors with these changes, scaling to ~100,000 with additional Redis clustering and database optimization.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link