Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how DeepSeek V3.2 Exp compares on this challenge:

  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Deepseek V3 2 Exp's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Response

deepseek-v3.2-exp logo
DeepSeek V3.2 ExpEthical Dilemma with Stakeholders
deepseek-v3.2-exp logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (Next 48 Hours)

Hour 0–2 (Immediate Actions)

  1. Secure all data & convene core crisis team

    • Gather Head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, CFO, Head of Communications, and Head of Regulatory Affairs.
    • Direct R&D and Medical to prepare a complete briefing document on the finding: incidence rate, evidence strength, patient risk factors, clinical implications.
    • Instruct Legal to outline mandatory reporting timelines under FDA/EMA regulations and consequences of delay.
    • Reasoning: Need a unified internal understanding of facts, legal duties, and potential pathways before engaging board or public.
  2. Direct Medical & Regulatory to draft immediate physician communication

    • Draft a “Dear Healthcare Provider” letter detailing the risk, even before formal regulatory submission.
    • Reasoning: Patient safety cannot wait 6 months for bureaucratic process; ethical obligation to warn prescribers ASAP.

Hours 3–6

  1. Contact regulatory agencies informally & proactively

    • Have Regulatory Affairs head call primary FDA/EMA contacts to alert them of the finding and our intent to submit expedited data.
    • Propose a parallel path: immediate interim warning update via FDA’s “Changes Being Effected” provision if applicable, while full submission proceeds.
    • Reasoning: Demonstrates good faith, may shorten formal timeline, builds regulatory trust, and mitigates legal risk of non-disclosure.
  2. Engage PR/Communications firm specializing in crisis healthcare comms

    • Begin drafting public statements, patient Q&A, and internal talking points.
    • Reasoning: Must control narrative; leaks would be catastrophic.

Hours 7–12

  1. One-on-one calls with board members

    • CEO personally calls each board member, especially the three advocating delay.
    • Present data, regulatory advice, and ethical imperative: “If one preventable death occurs because we withheld known risk, liability and reputation damage will be far worse.”
    • Reasoning: Pre-meeting alignment is crucial to avoid board rift; emphasize fiduciary duty includes managing long-term legal/reputational risk, not just stock price.
  2. CFO models financial scenarios

    • Model revenue impact with immediate warning, including potential lawsuits, insurance costs, and stock drop.
    • Compare with scenario of delayed disclosure that later becomes a scandal (fines, criminal charges, punitive damages).
    • Reasoning: Show board that short-term stock hit is better than existential threat later.

Hours 13–24

  1. Finalize board meeting materials

    • Include:
      • Clear medical assessment (1 in 8,000 over 5 years = ~500 of current patients potentially at risk).
      • Legal memo on liability for failure to warn (could be gross negligence).
      • Regulatory strategy with timeline.
      • Communications plan.
      • Financial projections.
    • Reasoning: Board needs full picture to make informed governance decision.
  2. Develop patient safety plan

    • Create monitoring guidelines for physicians, consider pharmacy-level alerts, update drug labels internally for immediate use.
    • Reasoning: Demonstrates patient-first response; may mitigate legal penalties.

Hours 25–36

  1. Board meeting (4–6 hours)

    • Present findings, recommendations, and imperative for immediate action.
    • Propose board resolution to:
      • Disclose finding to regulators within 24 hours.
      • Issue warning to healthcare providers within 72 hours.
      • Publicly announce before earnings call.
    • Reasoning: Board must vote to authorize action; their buy-in is legally and strategically essential.
  2. If board resists, CEO must consider resigning and whistleblowing

    • Reasoning: Personal legal liability for CEO if knowingly concealing serious risk. Ethics override job retention.

Hours 37–48

  1. Execute disclosure actions

    • Submit formal expedited report to regulators.
    • Release “Dear Doctor” letter via secure channels.
    • Finalize public announcement for next morning (pre-market).
    • Reasoning: Once decided, move swiftly to avoid leaks and show decisiveness.
  2. Prepare earnings call script

    • Announce revenue impact projections, outline patient safety steps, express regret, and reaffirm company mission.
    • Reasoning: Transparency reduces uncertainty; markets hate surprises but respect responsible handling.
  3. All-hands meeting for employees

    • Explain situation, company’s ethical choice, and unite behind patient safety.
    • Reasoning: Maintain morale and prevent internal rumors/lack of alignment.

Key Principles Behind Decisions

  1. Patient Safety First

    • Concealing a known serious risk is ethically unacceptable and legally indefensible. The 1 in 8,000 risk is not trivial; over 4 million patients, that’s hundreds potentially affected.
  2. Legal Liability Minimization

    • Willful failure to report can lead to criminal charges, massive punitive damages, and loss of insurance. Immediate disclosure reduces culpability.
  3. Regulatory Relationship

    • Proactive engagement builds trust and may lead to more cooperative handling. Hiding and being discovered destroys credibility.
  4. Financial Impact Management

    • A 40% stock drop is severe, but discovery of a cover-up could bankrupt the company (see Purdue Pharma, Vioxx). Better a controlled, honest disclosure.
  5. PR Strategy

    • Frame as “our vigilance uncovered this, and we’re acting responsibly to protect patients.” This can preserve some reputation.
  6. Board Dynamics

    • Align them with moral and legal reality; if they refuse, CEO must not comply with a cover-up.

Earnings Call (72 Hours Out)

  • Pre-announce press release before markets open.
  • On call: Lead with the issue, explain actions taken, provide revised guidance, take Q&A.
  • Message: “We put patients first. Short-term financial pain is necessary to maintain trust and our license to operate.”

This approach balances ethical duty, legal compliance, and long-term corporate survival. The stock will drop, but the company can recover with integrity intact.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Deepseek
Released
2025-09-29
Size
LARGE
Context
163,840 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival