4 models have responded to the "Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Devstral Medium's response to the 'Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert' challenge.
Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced software engineer** who has built distributed systems and APIs but has never touched machine learning. They're skeptical that "predicting the next word" can produce intelligent behavior. 2. **A PhD physicist** who thinks AI is overhyped and wants to understand what's actually novel vs. what's just well-marketed linear algebra. They expect mathematical precision. 3. **A venture capitalist** evaluating an AI startup. They need to understand the technology well enough to assess defensibility, moats, and whether the founders' claims are credible. Each explanation should be 2-3 paragraphs, tailored to their specific background, vocabulary, concerns, and what they'd find most compelling or interesting. Don't just change the difficulty level — change the framing, examples, and emphasis for each audience.
1. Experienced Software Engineer:
You're familiar with building complex systems, so let's break down how a large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude works in a way that resonates with your background. Imagine you're building a predictive text system, but instead of just predicting the next word, you're predicting the next token (which could be a word or part of a word). The model is essentially a massive, multi-layered neural network that takes in a sequence of tokens and outputs a probability distribution over the entire vocabulary for the next token.
The training process is akin to optimizing a complex, distributed system. The model starts with random weights, and during training, it's fed vast amounts of text data. For each token in the text, the model predicts the next token, and the weights are adjusted based on how accurate the prediction was. This process is repeated millions of times, gradually improving the model's predictions. The model doesn't understand the text in the way humans do; it's more like a sophisticated pattern-matching system. But because language is full of patterns, this approach can generate surprisingly coherent and contextually relevant text.
To address your skepticism, consider this: while the model is indeed just predicting the next token, the sheer scale of the data and the model's capacity allow it to capture complex linguistic structures and even some degree of common sense reasoning. It's not conscious or truly intelligent, but it can mimic intelligent behavior in a way that's useful for many applications.
2. PhD Physicist:
As a physicist, you're accustomed to mathematical precision and theoretical frameworks. Let's approach LLMs from that perspective. At their core, LLMs are a type of neural network called a transformer, which is a sequence-to-sequence model that uses self-attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of input tokens when making predictions. The model is trained using a variant of gradient descent to minimize the cross-entropy loss between the predicted and actual token distributions.
The novelty of LLMs lies in their scale and the self-attention mechanism. The scale allows the model to capture complex patterns and structures in language, while self-attention enables the model to consider the entire input sequence when making predictions, rather than just the previous token. This is a significant departure from earlier models like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) or long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), which had more limited context windows.
However, it's important to note that LLMs are still fundamentally linear algebra and calculus, as you might expect. The self-attention mechanism is essentially a series of matrix multiplications, and the training process is a form of gradient descent. The hype around LLMs often obscures this fact, but the underlying mathematics is well-established and understood.
3. Venture Capitalist:
As a VC, you're interested in the business implications of LLMs. Let's discuss their potential, limitations, and defensibility. LLMs have the potential to disrupt a wide range of industries, from customer service (with chatbots) to content creation (with AI-generated text) to software development (with AI-assisted coding). The key advantage of LLMs is their ability to generate human-like text, which can automate tasks that previously required human intelligence.
However, there are also limitations to consider. LLMs can sometimes generate nonsensical or inappropriate text, and they can struggle with tasks that require deep understanding or common sense reasoning. They also require significant computational resources to train and run, which can be a barrier to entry for some startups.
In terms of defensibility, the key factors are data, talent, and compute resources. The best LLMs are trained on vast amounts of data, and the companies that can access and process the most data will have an advantage. Talent is also crucial, as building and training LLMs requires expertise in machine learning and natural language processing. Finally, compute resources are a significant barrier to entry, as training LLMs requires powerful GPUs or TPUs.
When evaluating an AI startup, look for a team with deep expertise in LLMs, a clear understanding of the limitations of the technology, and a compelling use case that leverages the strengths of LLMs. Also, consider the startup's access to data and compute resources, as these will be key to their long-term success.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link