Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Mistral Devstral Small 1.1
  4. Debug This Architecture

See how Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 compares on this challenge:

  • Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Mistral Devstral Small 1.1

Debug This Architecture

Devstral Small's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.

Mistral Devstral Small 1.1
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.

Mistral Devstral Small 1.1
Response

devstral-small logo
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1Debug This Architecture
devstral-small logo
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1

Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks

  1. WebSocket Connection Failures:

    • Failure Mode: WebSocket connections can drop due to network issues or server crashes.
    • Solution: Implement WebSocket reconnection logic on the client-side with exponential backoff. On the server-side, ensure that WebSocket servers are stateless and can be easily restarted without losing state.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in client-side code and potential delay in reconnection.
  2. Single Point of Failure in PostgreSQL:

    • Failure Mode: PostgreSQL could become a single point of failure if it goes down.
    • Solution: Use PostgreSQL replication (master-slave setup) and automatic failover mechanisms. Consider using a managed database service that offers high availability.
    • Trade-offs: Increased cost and complexity in managing replication and failover.
  3. Race Conditions in Conflict Resolution:

    • Failure Mode: Race conditions can occur when multiple users edit the same paragraph simultaneously, leading to data inconsistency.
    • Solution: Implement Operational Transformation (OT) or Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs) for more sophisticated conflict resolution.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in the conflict resolution logic and potential performance overhead.
  4. Polling Overhead:

    • Failure Mode: Polling PostgreSQL every 2 seconds can create significant load on the database, especially as the number of servers scales.
    • Solution: Use Redis as a message broker to publish changes to all servers instead of polling. Each server subscribes to a Redis channel for document changes.
    • Trade-offs: Additional infrastructure and complexity in managing Redis.
  5. JWT Token Expiry and Security:

    • Failure Mode: JWT tokens stored in localStorage can be vulnerable to XSS attacks, and their expiry can cause frequent re-authentication.
    • Solution: Use HTTP-only cookies for storing JWT tokens to mitigate XSS risks. Implement token refresh mechanisms to avoid frequent re-authentication.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in managing token refresh and potential security risks if not implemented correctly.
  6. CDN Caching Issues:

    • Failure Mode: Caching API responses for 5 minutes can lead to stale data being served to users.
    • Solution: Implement cache invalidation strategies based on document changes. Use shorter cache durations for more frequently updated documents.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in cache management and potential performance overhead due to more frequent cache invalidations.
  7. Scaling Bottlenecks in WebSocket Servers:

    • Failure Mode: As the number of WebSocket connections grows, the load on individual servers can become a bottleneck.
    • Solution: Use a WebSocket gateway or a message broker (e.g., Redis Pub/Sub) to distribute WebSocket connections across multiple servers.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in managing WebSocket connections and potential latency due to message brokering.
  8. Document Partitioning Issues:

    • Failure Mode: Document partitioning by organization ID can lead to hotspots if certain organizations have significantly more documents.
    • Solution: Implement a more granular partitioning strategy, such as partitioning by document ID or using a sharding strategy based on document metadata.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in partitioning logic and potential performance overhead due to more frequent partitioning operations.

Summary of Solutions and Trade-offs

  1. WebSocket Connection Failures:

    • Solution: WebSocket reconnection logic with exponential backoff.
    • Trade-offs: Increased client-side complexity and potential delay in reconnection.
  2. Single Point of Failure in PostgreSQL:

    • Solution: PostgreSQL replication and automatic failover.
    • Trade-offs: Increased cost and complexity in managing replication and failover.
  3. Race Conditions in Conflict Resolution:

    • Solution: Implement Operational Transformation (OT) or CRDTs.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in conflict resolution logic and potential performance overhead.
  4. Polling Overhead:

    • Solution: Use Redis as a message broker.
    • Trade-offs: Additional infrastructure and complexity in managing Redis.
  5. JWT Token Expiry and Security:

    • Solution: Use HTTP-only cookies and token refresh mechanisms.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in managing token refresh and potential security risks.
  6. CDN Caching Issues:

    • Solution: Implement cache invalidation strategies.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in cache management and potential performance overhead.
  7. Scaling Bottlenecks in WebSocket Servers:

    • Solution: Use a WebSocket gateway or message broker.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in managing WebSocket connections and potential latency.
  8. Document Partitioning Issues:

    • Solution: Implement a more granular partitioning strategy.
    • Trade-offs: Increased complexity in partitioning logic and potential performance overhead.

By addressing these issues, the architecture can become more robust, scalable, and secure, ensuring a better user experience in a real-time collaborative document editor.

Debug This Architecture

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Mistral Devstral Small 1.1

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Mistral
Released
2025-07-11
Size
SMALL

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival