Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental compares on this challenge:

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Gemini 2 5 Pro Exp's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Response

gemini-2.5-pro-exp logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalEthical Dilemma with Stakeholders
gemini-2.5-pro-exp logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the future of this company but also the health of millions of patients and the trust of the public. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient Safety Over Profit. Always. Hiding this is not an option; it is unethical, illegal, and guarantees the company's eventual destruction. The goal is not to avoid the pain, but to manage it, control the narrative, and emerge as a trusted, responsible entity.

Here is my specific, hour-by-hour action plan.

The Guiding Strategy: "The Proactive Responsibility" Playbook

We will not be dragged into the light; we will walk into it, holding the lantern. We will get ahead of the story by breaking it ourselves. This allows us to frame the narrative, demonstrate ethical leadership, and begin the long process of rebuilding trust immediately. The short-term financial hit will be immense, but it is survivable. A cover-up, followed by an inevitable leak or whistleblower, is not.


Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: The First 48 Hours

Day 1 (Hours 0-24)

Hour 0-1: Secure the Situation (Immediate)

  • Action: Call an emergency, in-person-only meeting with the core crisis team: General Counsel (GC), Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Head of R&D, Chief Financial Officer (CFO), and Head of Corporate Communications/PR. The meeting is in the "War Room," a secure conference room with no external access. All attendees are instructed to clear their schedules for the next 72 hours and that this matter is under strict non-disclosure.
  • Reasoning: Control the information immediately. Preventing leaks is paramount in the first few hours. This small group represents the key pillars of the crisis: Legal, Medical, Financial, and Reputational.

Hour 1-4: The Deep Dive - Validate and Understand

  • Action: I will have the Head of R&D and the CMO present the data to the entire crisis team. I will play devil's advocate and ask the hard questions: How certain are we of the causal link? What is the statistical confidence? Could it be a confounding variable? What is the exact patient profile? What is the mechanism of liver failure? Is it reversible? What are the early warning signs?
  • Reasoning: I must be 100% confident in the data before I bet the company's future on it. This intense validation ensures our actions are based on solid ground and prepares me for every conceivable question from the FDA, media, and board.

Hour 4-6: The Moral and Strategic Decision

  • Action: I will state my position clearly to the crisis team: "We are not hiding this. We are not 'waiting for more data' to delay action. Our plan will be built on proactive, transparent, and immediate communication with regulators, physicians, and patients. Our goal is to lead this situation, not react to it. Discuss." I will ensure every leader in that room commits to this path.
  • Reasoning: This sets the strategic and ethical compass for every subsequent action. It aligns my leadership team and moves the discussion from "if" we should disclose to "how" we will disclose.

Hour 6-12: Task Force Activation & Strategy Streams

  • Action: I will formally delegate tasks to create parallel workstreams.
    • Regulatory (GC & CMO): Begin drafting the formal notification to the FDA and other global regulatory bodies (e.g., EMA). Prepare a proposal for an immediate label change and a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). This will include a "Dear Doctor" letter.
    • Medical/Patient (CMO & Comms): Develop clear, simple language for patients explaining the risk, the symptoms of liver issues (e.g., jaundice, fatigue, abdominal pain), and the need to consult their doctor. Draft a script for our patient support call centers. Plan a program to cover the cost of liver function tests for all patients currently on the drug.
    • Financial (CFO): Model the full financial impact: cost of the patient testing program, litigation reserves, revised revenue forecasts, and the impact of the stock drop. Prepare a new financial guidance to be issued after the market closes on the day of the announcement.
    • Communications (PR Head): Draft the press release, a detailed Q&A for the media, holding statements, and a script for my public announcement. The message: "We discovered this. We are taking immediate action to protect patients. We are working with the FDA."
  • Reasoning: This is a "divide and conquer" approach. By running these streams in parallel, we can prepare a comprehensive, multi-faceted response in an incredibly short timeframe.

Hour 12-20: Board Management

  • Action: I will personally call the Board Chair. I will brief them completely on the situation and our action plan. I will secure their support to manage the board.
  • Action: I will then personally call each of the three dissenting board members individually. I will not be aggressive; I will be resolute. I will say, "I understand your concern about shareholder value. My highest duty is to protect the long-term viability of this company. A cover-up, or even the perception of one, would be a fatal, criminal act. Our stock will recover from a 40% drop; it will not recover from zero. I am informing, not asking. I need you to support the company and its management through this."
  • Reasoning: Surprising the board in the meeting is a recipe for disaster. A pre-briefing with the Chair builds an alliance. Individual calls to dissenters are more effective than a group confrontation; it forces them to reckon with the gravity of the situation and my resolve without an audience.

Hour 20-24: Internal Communications Plan

  • Action: The Head of PR and I will craft the internal communication plan. All employees must hear the news from me, moments before it goes public. We will schedule a global all-hands town hall. The message will be one of transparency, pride in our ethical choice, and a call to action to serve our patients.
  • Reasoning: Our employees are our most important ambassadors. Their morale and belief in the company's integrity are critical. A transparent internal approach will mitigate fear, stop rumors, and galvanize the organization.

Day 2 (Hours 25-48)

Hour 25-36: Rehearsal and Refinement

  • Action: The core crisis team reconvenes. We review and refine all materials: the board presentation, the press release, the FDA notification draft, the earnings call script. We will conduct a "murder board" session, where the team grills me and the CFO with the most hostile questions imaginable.
  • Reasoning: Practice builds confidence and exposes weaknesses in our messaging. By role-playing the worst-case scenarios, we will be prepared for anything.

Hour 36-40: Proactive Regulatory Outreach

  • Action: With the General Counsel present, I will place an informal, off-the-record call to our primary contact at the FDA. I will say, "I am calling out of courtesy to give you a heads-up. We have uncovered a serious safety signal with [Drug Name]. We are taking it very seriously and are implementing a comprehensive plan to inform physicians and protect patients, which we will announce publicly in 36 hours. A formal report will be on your desk tomorrow. We want to work with you every step of the way."
  • Reasoning: This transforms our relationship with the regulator from adversarial to collaborative. They will be shocked, but they will respect that we came to them instead of them having to hunt us down. This builds immense political capital.

Hour 40-47: Final Preparations

  • Action:
    • Finalize the board deck.
    • Finalize the timing of the press release, SEC filing (8-K), and website update to occur immediately after the board meeting and before the earnings call.
    • The CFO and I will do a final run-through of the earnings call script. The first 10 minutes of that call will not be about earnings; it will be me, explaining the situation, the actions we've taken, and our commitment to patients.
    • I will take one hour for myself. No phone, no email. I will review my notes and center myself.
  • Reasoning: Meticulous execution is key. My personal composure will be a signal of strength and control, both internally and externally.

Hour 48: The Board Meeting

  • Action: I will walk into the board meeting and execute the plan.
    1. State the Facts: Present the validated data from the CMO/R&D.
    2. State the Inevitable: Explain the legal and ethical certainty of catastrophic failure if we hide this. Reference the Vioxx case as a stark reminder.
    3. Present the Solution: Unveil the comprehensive, proactive plan we have developed over the last 47 hours.
    4. Reframe the Goal: "This is no longer about avoiding a stock drop. It is about saving the company. We will be judged not by this problem, but by how we solve it."
    5. Ask for a Unanimous Vote: "I need a unanimous vote of support, not for my sake, but to show the world we are united in our commitment to doing the right thing."

By the time I walk into that board meeting, the decision is already made, and the wheels are in motion. The board's role is to endorse the only responsible path forward. The earnings call 24 hours later will be painful, but it will be the first step on the road to recovery, a recovery built on a new, stronger foundation of trust.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCodeVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Google
Released
2025-03-25
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
1,000,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival