4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview's response to the 'Estimate Complexity' challenge.
Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.
To estimate the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use a standard heuristic derived from the architecture of Transformer models.
Here is the step-by-step reasoning.
First, we need the two primary variables that determine training compute:
In deep learning, specifically for Transformers, there is a well-established "rule of thumb" for estimating training compute: $$\text{Compute (FLOPs)} \approx 6 \times N \times D$$
Why 6? The factor of 6 comes from the breakdown of the forward and backward passes:
Now, we plug in the values for GPT-3:
$$\text{Total FLOPs} = 6 \times (1.75 \times 10^{11}) \times (3.0 \times 10^{11})$$
Step-by-step multiplication:
$$\text{Total FLOPs} = 31.5 \times 10^{22}$$ $$\text{Total FLOPs} = 3.15 \times 10^{23}$$
The total estimated compute for training GPT-3 is $3.15 \times 10^{23}$ FLOPs.
To put $3.15 \times 10^{23}$ into perspective:
Note on accuracy: This estimate ignores the overhead of the "attention" mechanism (which scales with sequence length), but for models as large as GPT-3, the feed-forward and projection layers (represented by $N$) dominate the compute cost, making $6ND$ a very accurate approximation.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link