Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Gemini 3 Flash Preview
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how Gemini 3 Flash Preview compares on this challenge:

  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Estimate Complexity

Gemini 3 Flash Preview's response to the 'Estimate Complexity' challenge.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview
December 17, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Response

gemini-3-flash-preview logo
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewEstimate Complexity
gemini-3-flash-preview logo
Gemini 3 Flash Preview

To estimate the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use a standard heuristic derived from the architecture of Transformer models.

Here is the step-by-step reasoning.

1. Identify Key Constants

First, we need the two primary variables that determine training compute:

  • Number of Parameters ($N$): GPT-3 (the full version) is known to have 175 billion parameters.
  • Number of Training Tokens ($D$): GPT-3 was trained on a massive dataset. Based on the original research paper, the 175B model was trained on approximately 300 billion tokens.

2. The Heuristic Formula ($6ND$)

In deep learning, specifically for Transformers, there is a well-established "rule of thumb" for estimating training compute: $$\text{Compute (FLOPs)} \approx 6 \times N \times D$$

Why 6? The factor of 6 comes from the breakdown of the forward and backward passes:

  • Forward Pass ($2N$): For every parameter in the model, there is roughly one multiply-accumulate operation (which counts as 2 FLOPs) per token.
  • Backward Pass ($4N$): The backward pass (calculating gradients) is computationally more expensive. It typically requires roughly twice the compute of the forward pass ($2 \times 2N = 4N$).
  • Total: $2N (\text{forward}) + 4N (\text{backward}) = 6N$ FLOPs per token.

3. The Calculation

Now, we plug in the values for GPT-3:

  • $N = 1.75 \times 10^{11}$ (175 billion)
  • $D = 3.0 \times 10^{11}$ (300 billion)

$$\text{Total FLOPs} = 6 \times (1.75 \times 10^{11}) \times (3.0 \times 10^{11})$$

Step-by-step multiplication:

  1. Multiply the coefficients: $6 \times 1.75 = 10.5$
  2. Multiply by the tokens: $10.5 \times 3.0 = 31.5$
  3. Combine the powers of ten: $10^{11} \times 10^{11} = 10^{22}$

$$\text{Total FLOPs} = 31.5 \times 10^{22}$$ $$\text{Total FLOPs} = 3.15 \times 10^{23}$$

4. Final Estimate

The total estimated compute for training GPT-3 is $3.15 \times 10^{23}$ FLOPs.

5. Contextualizing the Number

To put $3.15 \times 10^{23}$ into perspective:

  • In scientific notation, this is 315 Sextillion FLOPs.
  • In terms of "Zettaflops" (10²¹), it is 315 ZettaFLOPs.
  • If you used a single high-end NVIDIA A100 GPU (which performs at roughly 312 TFLOPS of FP16 with Tensor Cores), and assuming perfect efficiency, it would take roughly 32 years to complete the training. (In reality, OpenAI used thousands of GPUs in parallel to finish in a few months).

Note on accuracy: This estimate ignores the overhead of the "attention" mechanism (which scales with sequence length), but for models as large as GPT-3, the feed-forward and projection layers (represented by $N$) dominate the compute cost, making $6ND$ a very accurate approximation.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool UseAgentic Tool Use

Categories

TextCodeMultimodalVisionAudioVideo

Specifications

Provider
Google
Released
2025-12-17
Size
LARGE
Context
1,048,576 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival