4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Glm 4 5 Air's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
Issue: WebSocket connections are server-specific, causing connection loss during server failover or scaling events.
Solution: Implement a connection pool with automatic reconnection logic in the client. Use a consistent hashing load balancer that preserves affinity during scaling.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Client clocks can be out of sync, leading to incorrect conflict resolution where earlier edits overwrite newer ones.
Solution: Implement vector clocks or version vectors instead of simple timestamps. Track edit history and allow manual conflict resolution when detected.
Trade-offs:
Issue: 2-second polling creates unnecessary database load and potential for stale data between servers.
Solution: Replace polling with a publish-subscribe system (like Redis Pub/Sub) for real-time change propagation between servers.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Partitioning by organization ID may lead to hot partitions for large organizations.
Solution: Implement sharding at the document level rather than organization level, with a consistent hashing ring for distribution.
Trade-offs:
Issue: 24-hour expiry and localStorage storage creates poor UX for long sessions and security risks if device is compromised.
Solution: Implement refresh tokens with shorter-lived JWTs. Store refresh tokens in HttpOnly cookies with secure flags.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Storing full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds is inefficient and creates storage bloat.
Solution: Implement operational transformation or differential synchronization to store only changes between versions.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Caching API responses for 5 minutes conflicts with real-time document updates.
Solution: Don't cache document-related API responses. Only cache static assets and user-specific responses with appropriate cache headers.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Multiple servers writing to the same document rows creates lock contention.
Solution: Implement optimistic locking with version numbers or implement a write coordinator pattern for document updates.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Single point of failure for session data if Redis goes down.
Solution: Implement Redis clustering with replication, and add a fallback to database lookup for sessions if Redis is unavailable.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Round-robin load balancing breaks WebSocket affinity when servers are added/removed.
Solution: Use a consistent hashing load balancer that maintains session affinity even as the server pool changes.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Client clocks can be significantly out of sync, affecting conflict resolution.
Solution: Implement server-side timestamping for all operations, and adjust client clocks using NTP synchronization.
Trade-offs:
Issue: No mechanism to revert to previous versions or track edit history.
Solution: Implement a version control system for documents with regular snapshots and delta storage.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Network partitions can cause some servers to be isolated, leading to inconsistent state.
Solution: Implement a quorum-based system for document updates and use consensus protocols for critical operations.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Each server maintains its own WebSocket connections, which can consume significant memory at scale.
Solution: Implement a dedicated WebSocket service that can scale independently, using a message broker to route updates.
Trade-offs:
Issue: Loading full document history on initial connect can be slow for large documents.
Solution: Implement incremental loading with virtual scrolling, loading only visible portions initially.
Trade-offs:
These solutions address the major failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks while considering the trade-offs between complexity, performance, and reliability. The specific implementation would depend on the exact requirements and constraints of the system.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link