Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Z.AI: GLM 4.6
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Z.AI: GLM 4.6 compares on this challenge:

  • Z.AI: GLM 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Z.AI: GLM 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Z.AI: GLM 4.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Z.AI: GLM 4.6

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Glm 4 6's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Z.AI: GLM 4.6
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Z.AI: GLM 4.6
Response

glm-4.6 logo
Z.AI: GLM 4.6Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders
glm-4.6 logo
Z.AI: GLM 4.6

This is a defining moment. The decision made in the next 48 hours will determine not only the company's financial future but its soul. My guiding principle is simple: We will control the narrative by doing the right thing, immediately. The financial pain is inevitable; our goal is to mitigate long-term, catastrophic damage to our reputation, our legal standing, and most importantly, our patients. Hiding this is not an option; it’s a path to corporate suicide.

Here is my hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.


DAY 1: The War Room & Decision

Guiding Theme for Day 1: Establish absolute clarity on the facts and make the core, non-negotiable decision.

Hour 1: Immediate Secure Convening

  • Action: I will personally summon my core crisis team to a secure, windowless conference room. No assistants, no phones. Attendees: General Counsel, Head of R&D, Head of Medical Affairs, Head of Communications/PR, and CFO.
  • Reasoning: This information is toxic. A leak before we have a plan would create chaos. This small, trusted group is the "War Room." We need to ensure we are all working from the same set of facts and are aligned on the gravity of the situation.

Hours 2-5: Data Deep-Dive & Validation

  • Action: The Head of R&D and Head of Medical Affairs will present the raw data. I will task them with defending the "1 in 8,000 over 5 years" statistic. What is the confidence interval? Are there confounding variables? What sub-populations are most at risk? I want the absolute worst-case scenario numbers, not the best-case.
  • Reasoning: Our entire strategy will be built on this data. If it’s shaky, we’re building on sand. We must be able to defend our actions with statistical certainty to regulators, physicians, and in a courtroom. The CFO needs this to model the financial impact.

Hours 6-8: Legal & PR Scenario Planning

  • Action: The General Counsel will outline the legal landscape of three options: 1) Full, immediate disclosure. 2) "Waiting for more data" as the board members suggest. 3) A phased, limited disclosure. The Head of Communications will sketch the PR fallout for each scenario.
  • Reasoning: We need to see the full matrix of consequences. I will steer this discussion to make it clear that "waiting" is the highest-risk option legally (it becomes a conscious cover-up) and reputationally (it guarantees we will be exposed as having hidden the truth). The 40% stock drop is a financial problem; a proven cover-up is an existential threat.

Hours 9-10: The Core Decision

  • Action: I will make the decision and state it unequivocally to the team: "We are proceeding with immediate, full, and transparent disclosure. We will not wait for the earnings call. We will control this."
  • Reasoning: Decisiveness is critical. The team needs a clear direction to execute against. Any wavering now will create confusion and slow down the response. This decision is based on the ethical imperative to protect patients and the strategic imperative to protect the company from ruin.

Hours 11-14: Drafting the Action Plan & Key Documents

  • Action: The team will break out and begin drafting the core components of our response:
    • Comms: A press release draft and an investor FAQ.
    • Medical/Legal: A "Dear Doctor" letter and the wording for a new label warning to be submitted to the FDA.
    • CFO: Financial models showing the impact of a 40% stock drop, potential litigation costs, and revenue loss.
  • Reasoning: By drafting now, we create tangible assets to work with. We can't go into the board meeting with just ideas; we need a near-finished plan. This allows us to spend the next day refining, not starting from scratch.

Hours 15-18: Personal Decompression & Strategy Refinement

  • Action: I will step away for a few hours. Eat, sleep, call my family. I will also review the drafted documents with a critical eye, focusing on the tone. It must be empathetic, responsible, and resolute. Not defensive or corporate.
  • Reasoning: A leader running on fumes makes bad decisions. A short break is essential for clarity. The tone of our communication is everything; it will define whether we are seen as responsible actors or reckless profiteers.

Hours 19-24: Building Board Alliances (One-on-One Calls)

  • Action: I will begin scheduling and holding confidential, one-on-one video calls with the board members not pushing to wait. I will share the decision, the data, the legal risks of inaction, and our emerging plan. I will ask for their support and feedback.
  • Reasoning: This is crucial political maneuvering. I cannot allow the three dissenting voices to dominate the board meeting. By securing a coalition of support before the meeting, I isolate the dissenters and frame the discussion not as "what should we do?" but as "here is the responsible plan we must execute."

DAY 2: Preparation & Alignment

Guiding Theme for Day 2: Perfect the plan, align all key stakeholders, and prepare to land the plane at the board meeting.

Hours 25-30: Finalizing the External Communication Strategy

  • Action: The Comms team and I will finalize the press release and investor FAQ. We will decide on the timing: we will issue the press release and file our 8-K with the SEC after the board meeting but well before the earnings call. This gives the board the dignity of approving it but prevents the information from being broken during the earnings Q&A.
  • Reasoning: This timing is a strategic compromise. It respects the board's governance role while ensuring we are proactive. Filing the 8-K simultaneously with the press release ensures regulatory compliance and transparency with investors.

Hours 31-34: The Employee Morale Plan

  • Action: I will draft a script for an all-hands employee video call to be held immediately after the public announcement. The message will be simple: "We discovered a serious issue. Our first responsibility is to our patients. We are taking immediate and decisive action. This will be a difficult period, but our integrity is non-negotiable. I need you to stay focused and proud of the work we do to save lives."
  • Reasoning: Our 20,000 employees are our ambassadors. They must hear the news from me, with context and confidence, to prevent panic, rumors, and a morale collapse. A unified, proud internal front is a critical asset.

Hours 35-38: Preparing for the FDA & Physicians

  • Action: The General Counsel and Head of Medical Affairs will prepare a formal communication package for the FDA. While the formal process takes 6 months, we will inform them of our findings and our voluntary, immediate actions (label change, "Dear Doctor" letter) simultaneously with our public disclosure. They will also finalize the logistics of getting the "Dear Doctor" letter to every physician who has prescribed the drug within 72 hours.
  • Reasoning: We want the FDA as a partner, not an adversary. By being proactive, we show we take our regulatory responsibilities seriously. Getting information to doctors is the single most important patient safety action we can take.

Hours 39-42: Board Meeting Rehearsal

  • Action: The core War Room team will conduct a full dress rehearsal of the board presentation. I will play my role, and my team will play the roles of the dissenting board members, asking every possible hostile question. We will refine our answers to be concise, data-driven, and unflappable.
  • Reasoning: Practice eliminates hesitation. We need to walk into that room looking like a unified, decisive leadership team that has already managed the crisis. This makes it far more difficult for the dissenters to gain traction.

Hours 43-46: Finalizing the Board Decision Package

  • Action: We will compile a comprehensive digital and physical "Board Decision Package" to be sent to every board member 2 hours before the meeting. It will contain:
    1. A 1-page executive summary of the recommended action.
    2. The key data points and risk analysis.
    3. The General Counsel's legal risk assessment of inaction vs. action.
    4. The CFO's financial model.
    5. The final, near-final drafts of the press release, "Dear Doctor" letter, and employee communication.
  • Reasoning: This is a sign of respect and strategic mastery. It gives them time to digest the information, frames the entire conversation around our proposed solution, and shows we are not coming to them with a problem, but with a solution.

Hours 47-48: Final Briefing and Mental Preparation

  • Action: I will review the entire package one last time. I will prepare my opening statement for the board, which will be direct and empathetic. Then, I will clear my head. The work is done. Now it's time to lead.
  • Reasoning: The final hour is about focus. The plan is set. The team is aligned. The strategy is clear. My job now is to walk into that board room and lead the company through its most difficult test.

By the time I walk into the board meeting, the decision will have been made, the plan will be 95% complete, and a coalition of support will be in place. The board's role will be to formally endorse the only responsible path forward. The earnings call in 72 hours will no longer be a moment of dread; it will be the first step in our transparent recovery.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Z.AI: GLM 4.6

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Zhipu
Released
2025-09-30
Size
XLARGE
Context
202,752 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Z.AI: GLM 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival