4 models have responded to the "Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Gpt 4O's response to the 'Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)' challenge.
You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B spend management + AP automation SaaS for mid-market enterprises. Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise, not investment advice. DATA - Current share price: $46 - Shares outstanding (basic): 190m - Net cash: $1.4B - FY2023 revenue: $560m - FY2024 revenue: $680m - FY2025 revenue: $820m - FY2025 gross margin: 78% - FY2025 operating margin: 18% - Revenue mix: 92% subscription, 8% services (services GM ~25%, subscription GM ~82%) - Customer KPIs: 6,200 customers; ARPA ~$132k; logo churn 6%/yr; gross retention 94%; NRR 123% - CAC payback: 18 months; S&M as % of revenue: 34% in FY2025 - Concentration: top 10 customers = 16% of revenue; top 1 = 3% - D&A: 2.5% of revenue - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Net working capital investment: 1.0% of incremental revenue - Cash tax rate: 23% VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS (build 2026-2030 forecasts) Base case: - Revenue growth: 21%, 18%, 15%, 13%, 12% - Gross margin: 79%, 80%, 80%, 81%, 81% - Operating margin: 20%, 22%, 24%, 25%, 26% - WACC: 10%, terminal growth: 3% Bull case: - Revenue growth: 25%, 21%, 18%, 15%, 13% - Gross margin: 80%, 81%, 82%, 82%, 83% - Operating margin: 21%, 24%, 26%, 28%, 29% - WACC: 9%, terminal growth: 4% Bear case: - Revenue growth: 16%, 13%, 11%, 10%, 9% - Gross margin: 78%, 78%, 79%, 79%, 80% - Operating margin: 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21% - WACC: 12%, terminal growth: 2% COMPS (fictional peer set) - Peer A: EV/NTM Revenue 9.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 35x - Peer B: EV/NTM Revenue 7.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 28x - Peer C: EV/NTM Revenue 11.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 42x Use the median multiple as your comps anchor, but explain adjustments. TASK Write a pro-level IC memo with: 1) Recommendation (Long/Short/Pass) + 12-month PT range + 2-sentence thesis 2) Business + why it wins / why now 3) KPI quality check (NRR, churn, CAC payback, concentration) and what could be wrong 4) Base/Bull/Bear model: show a compact table for 2026-2030 revenue, EBIT, and unlevered FCF; compute DCF EV, equity value, and implied value per share for each scenario (show key steps, not every line) 5) Comps cross-check: implied EV and per-share range using median multiples 6) Catalysts (3), Risks (5), and "what would change my mind" (3 falsifiable triggers) 7) 10 diligence questions for management Keep the memo under ~1,200 words, excluding tables.
Internal Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (Ticker: LLLT)
Recommendation: Long
12-Month Price Target Range: $55 - $68
Thesis: LedgerLift demonstrates strong growth potential driven by its robust subscription model and impressive customer retention metrics. The company’s strategic focus on mid-market enterprises positions it well for continued expansion, supported by industry-leading gross margins and efficient cost management.
1. Business Overview and Competitive Positioning
LedgerLift operates in the B2B spend management and AP automation SaaS market, catering to mid-market enterprises. The company differentiates itself by offering a comprehensive platform with strong integration capabilities, resulting in a high subscription gross margin of ~82%. With 92% of revenue derived from subscriptions, LedgerLift maintains a predictable and scalable business model. Its competitive edge lies in its ability to deliver both cost savings and operational efficiency to clients, bolstered by a net retention rate (NRR) of 123%.
2. KPI Quality Check and Potential Concerns
LedgerLift’s customer KPIs are indicative of a healthy and growing business. The NRR of 123% suggests strong upselling and cross-selling capabilities, while a logo churn of 6% per year indicates solid customer satisfaction and retention. The CAC payback period of 18 months is reasonable, given the industry standard, and reflects efficient sales and marketing efforts. Revenue concentration risk is low, with the top 10 customers accounting for 16% of revenue. However, any negative shift in customer satisfaction or increased competition could impact these metrics adversely.
3. Financial Forecast and Valuation Analysis
Base Case (2026-2030):
Bull Case (2026-2030):
Bear Case (2026-2030):
4. Comps Cross-Check
Using the median EV/NTM Revenue multiple of 9.0x and EV/NTM EBIT multiple of 35x from the peer set:
5. Catalysts
6. Risks
7. “What Would Change My Mind”
8. Diligence Questions for Management
This memo provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of LedgerLift’s business, financial forecasts, and strategic positioning, supporting our long recommendation with a price target range of $55 - $68 over the next 12 months.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link