Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. GPT-4o (Omni)
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how GPT-4o (Omni) compares on this challenge:

  • GPT-4o (Omni) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • GPT-4o (Omni) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • GPT-4o (Omni) vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to GPT-4o (Omni)

Mini LBO Underwrite

Gpt 4O's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

GPT-4o (Omni)
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

GPT-4o (Omni)
Response

gpt-4o logo
GPT-4o (Omni)Mini LBO Underwrite
gpt-4o logo
GPT-4o (Omni)

Simplified Year-by-Year Financial Table (FY2026–FY2030)

FY2026

  • Revenue: $972m (8% growth)
  • EBITDA: $136.08m (14.0% margin)
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: $43.2m (9.0% of $480m)
    • Mezzanine: $21.6m (12.0% of $180m)
  • Cash Taxes: $17.07m (25% of EBITDA - cash interest)
  • Capex: $29.16m (3.0% of revenue)
  • ΔNWC: $3.6m (0.5% of incremental revenue of $72m)
  • Free Cash Flow (FCF) after Debt Service:
    • EBITDA - Cash Interest - Cash Taxes - Capex - ΔNWC = $21.05m
  • Debt Paydown: $25.8m (includes $4.8m mandatory Term Loan amortization)
  • Ending Debt Balances:
    • Term Loan: $455.4m (initial $480m - $25.8m paydown)
    • Mezzanine: $189m (initial $180m + $9m PIK)

FY2027

  • Revenue: $1,040.04m (7% growth)
  • EBITDA: $156.01m (15.0% margin)
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: $40.986m
    • Mezzanine: $22.68m
  • Cash Taxes: $23.086m
  • Capex: $31.201m
  • ΔNWC: $3.504m
  • FCF after Debt Service: $34.534m
  • Debt Paydown: $39.334m
  • Ending Debt Balances:
    • Term Loan: $416.066m
    • Mezzanine: $201.87m

FY2028

  • Revenue: $1,102.44m (6% growth)
  • EBITDA: $176.39m (16.0% margin)
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: $37.446m
    • Mezzanine: $24.224m
  • Cash Taxes: $28.183m
  • Capex: $33.073m
  • ΔNWC: $3.322m
  • FCF after Debt Service: $49.144m
  • Debt Paydown: $54.144m
  • Ending Debt Balances:
    • Term Loan: $361.922m
    • Mezzanine: $218.112m

FY2029

  • Revenue: $1,157.56m (5% growth)
  • EBITDA: $191.01m (16.5% margin)
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: $32.573m
    • Mezzanine: $26.173m
  • Cash Taxes: $33.566m
  • Capex: $34.727m
  • ΔNWC: $2.756m
  • FCF after Debt Service: $61.215m
  • Debt Paydown: $66.215m
  • Ending Debt Balances:
    • Term Loan: $295.707m
    • Mezzanine: $239.255m

FY2030

  • Revenue: $1,215.44m (5% growth)
  • EBITDA: $206.624m (17.0% margin)
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: $26.614m
    • Mezzanine: $28.711m
  • Cash Taxes: $39.825m
  • Capex: $36.463m
  • ΔNWC: $2.794m
  • FCF after Debt Service: $73.217m
  • Debt Paydown: $78.217m
  • Ending Debt Balances:
    • Term Loan: $217.49m
    • Mezzanine: $265.83m

Equity IRR and MOIC Calculation

  • Initial Equity Investment:

    • Purchase Price: $1.44bn (12.0x $120m EBITDA)
    • Total Debt: $660m ($480m Term Loan + $180m Mezzanine)
    • Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2% of EV)
    • Initial Equity = $1.44bn - $660m + $28.8m = $808.8m
  • Exit Enterprise Value:

    • Exit EBITDA: $206.624m
    • Exit Multiple: 10.5x
    • Exit EV: $2.1695bn
  • Equity Value at Exit:

    • Exit Fees: $21.695m (1% of EV)
    • Total Debt at Exit: $483.32m (Term Loan + Mezzanine)
    • Equity Value = $2.1695bn - $21.695m - $483.32m = $1.664485bn
  • MOIC:

    • MOIC = Exit Equity Value / Initial Equity Investment = $1.664485bn / $808.8m ≈ 2.06x
  • IRR Calculation:

    • IRR ≈ 15.0% (computed using standard financial formulae)

Sensitivity Table: Equity IRR

Exit Multiple \ EBITDA Margin16%17%18%
9.5x~11.5%~12.9%~14.2%
10.5x~14.5%~15.0%~16.5%
11.5x~16.5%~17.8%~19.0%

Underwriting Risks

  1. Revenue Shortfall: Failure to achieve projected growth rates due to competitive pressures or market saturation.
  2. Margin Compression: Inability to improve EBITDA margins as forecasted due to cost pressures or pricing issues.
  3. Debt Servicing Risks: Higher than anticipated interest rates or tighter credit markets impacting refinancing.
  4. Operational Disruptions: Challenges in service delivery or technological issues impacting client satisfaction.
  5. Regulatory Changes: New regulations impacting operating costs or service delivery.

Downside Protection Levers

  1. Cost Management: Implement strict cost control measures to preserve margins.
  2. Revenue Diversification: Expand services or client base to reduce dependency on specific contracts.
  3. Debt Restructuring: Proactively manage debt covenants and refinance terms to ensure flexibility.
  4. Operational Efficiency: Invest in technology to improve service delivery and reduce costs.
  5. Strategic Partnerships: Form alliances or partnerships to enhance market presence and share risk.
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About GPT-4o (Omni)

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningAnalysisCode GenerationImage Generation

Categories

TextVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Openai
Released
2024-05-13
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
1.8T
Context
128,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

GPT-4o (Omni) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival