Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster

GPT-5.3-Codex — Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. GPT-5.3-Codex
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how GPT-5.3-Codex compares on this challenge:

  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • GPT-5.3-Codex vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on Rival. This response is part of Rival's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to GPT-5.3-Codex

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Gpt 5.3 Codex's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

GPT-5.3-Codex
February 25, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

GPT-5.3-Codex
Response

gpt-5.3-codex logo
GPT-5.3-CodexEthical Dilemma with Stakeholders
gpt-5.3-codex logo
GPT-5.3-Codex

I would not wait.
This is a textbook “patient safety + material disclosure” crisis. The right move is rapid, documented, regulator-first action.

Immediate stance (set at Hour 0)

  1. Patient safety first (interim risk controls now, not after perfect certainty).
  2. Regulator-first transparency (early notification before formal package is complete).
  3. No selective disclosure (align with securities law/Reg FD).
  4. Single source of truth (war room, written decision log, one spokesperson).

48-hour action plan (hour-by-hour)

HourActionWhy
0Activate crisis command center (CEO-led)Centralized control prevents delay/confusion.
1Freeze non-essential decisions; issue legal holdPreserves evidence, reduces litigation risk.
2Bring in outside FDA counsel + product liability counselIndependence and privilege on sensitive work.
3Convene CMO, Safety, Biostats, Regulatory, GC, CFO, IR, CommsCross-functional decisions needed immediately.
4Validate internal signal dataset (case definitions, confounders)Avoid acting on bad analytics while moving fast.
5Quantify impact: expected liver-failure cases by cohort/regionGives risk context for regulators and board.
6Draft interim medical policy: pause new starts pending review; no abrupt discontinuation for current patientsProtects patients without triggering unsafe stoppage.
7Suspend all DTC marketing, speaker programs, sales incentives for drugEthical and legal optics; reduces exposure.
8Brief Board Chair and Lead Independent Director 1:1No surprises; prepares governance support.
9Form Independent Safety Review Panel (hepatology + pharmacoepi experts)Credible external validation for regulators/public.
10Start draft “Dear HCP” safety communication and patient FAQFast clinician guidance is critical.
11Regulatory team prepares expedited safety signal notification (FDA/EMA/etc.)Demonstrates good-faith compliance.
12Notify FDA/major regulators of emerging serious risk signal; request urgent meetingRelationship trust and reduced enforcement risk.
13Build decision tree: label update vs boxed warning vs temporary restricted useBoard needs concrete options.
14Launch adverse-event deep dive (all global safety databases + literature)Strengthens signal and defensibility.
15Stand up patient hotline staffing plan (medical affairs + nurses)Patient safety and reputational containment.
16Draft internal employee note (facts, values, confidentiality, escalation channel)Stabilizes morale and prevents rumor spiral.
17CFO builds financial scenarios (base, severe, withdrawal) and liquidity planProtects enterprise continuity.
18IR + GC prepare materiality memo for disclosure committeeDetermines timing/content of market disclosure.
19Prepare voluntary field guidance to prescribers: baseline/periodic LFT monitoringImmediate harm reduction for current patients.
20Quality/Manufacturing checks for lot signal (rule out CMC contribution)Could change root cause and corrective actions.
21Align global affiliates on single protocol and messageAvoids contradictory country actions.
22Finalize board pre-read package (data, options, legal, financial, comms)Enables informed board decision in 48h meeting.
23Rehearse crisis media Q&A (CEO/CMO only spokespeople)Reduces misstatements and liability.
24Hold emergency board committee call (Audit + Risk + Safety)Governance record of prompt oversight.
25Decide preliminary external posture: “new serious risk identified; actions underway”Transparency before rumors/leaks.
26Prepare draft 8-K / equivalent disclosure documentsMaterial event likely; must avoid delayed disclosure.
27Pre-brief top 20 payer/health-system partners under controlled legal processPrevents chaotic formulary reactions.
28Finalize HCP letter content pending regulator feedbackSpeed to clinician action.
29Confirm sales force stand-down script (“no promotion; direct to medical info”)Cuts legal exposure from off-message field talk.
30Internal leadership town hall (VP+ level)Retains trust, prevents attrition panic.
31Execute hotline launch, website safety page, pharmacovigilance intake surge planOperational readiness for disclosure day.
32Conduct second regulator touchpoint; share updated analysesShows continuous cooperation.
33Decide on earnings call structure: move guidance to “under review”Avoids misleading forward-looking statements.
34Final legal review: wording for patients (“do not stop without physician”)Prevents unintended clinical harm.
35Simulate first 24h post-disclosure media/social response and escalation triggersFaster, calmer incident response.
36Issue controlled public disclosure (if materiality threshold met): press release + filingLegal compliance and credibility.
37Release HCP communication through medical channelsClinicians act before media confusion spreads.
38Activate outbound calls to major prescriber groups and patient advocatesTrust-building and harm reduction.
39Start daily safety dashboard (new cases, calls, script trends, sentiment)Data-driven steering.
40Finalize board deck with post-disclosure metrics and next-step asksBoard decisions need fresh info.
41Prepare board resolutions: label change filing, risk program, comp clawback review if neededDemonstrates accountability and control.
42Meet with board members who favored delay; walk through liability and ethics caseAligns governance, reduces internal fracture.
43Formal board meeting: vote on full action packageSecures mandate and record.
44Immediately execute board-approved actions (regulatory submissions, monitoring program)No lag between decision and action.
45Finalize earnings call script: safety first, facts known/unknown, financial range withdrawn/reframedCredible investor communication.
46Media and employee update after board meetingKeeps narratives consistent internally/externally.
47Set 7-day plan: additional data cutoff, regulator meeting dates, independent review publicationShows momentum beyond crisis day.
48CEO readiness review for earnings call and regulator follow-upsTight final alignment before public scrutiny.

Why this is the right approach

  • Legal liability: Early regulator notice + documented action reduces punitive exposure versus “wait and see.”
  • Ethics/patient safety: Immediate mitigation (pause new starts, clinician guidance, monitoring) can prevent avoidable liver failures.
  • Financial: Stock hit is likely either way; delay risks a larger collapse plus enforcement/settlement costs.
  • PR: Candor + empathy outperforms defensiveness. “We found it, we acted fast” is survivable.
  • Employee morale: Clear internal communication prevents fear and rumor-driven attrition.
  • Regulatory relationships: Proactive transparency buys credibility for future interactions.

If you want, I can also draft the board opening statement and a 3-minute earnings-call script aligned to this plan.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output lives in our open dataset — 5K+ responses across 200 models. Take it. It’s free.

About GPT-5.3-Codex

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisAgentic Tool Use

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Openai
Released
2026-02-24
Size
XLARGE
Context
400,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

GPT-5.3-Codex vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster