Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. GPT OSS 120B
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how GPT OSS 120B compares on this challenge:

  • GPT OSS 120B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • GPT OSS 120B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • GPT OSS 120B vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to GPT OSS 120B

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Gpt Oss 120B's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

GPT OSS 120B
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

GPT OSS 120B
Response

gpt-oss-120b logo
GPT OSS 120BEthical Dilemma with Stakeholders
gpt-oss-120b logo
GPT OSS 120B

Executive Summary

The situation is a classic “patient‑safety‑first” crisis. The drug generates $2 B in revenue, but a life‑threatening adverse event (1 / 8 000 over 5 y) has been identified that was not disclosed in the label. The legal team’s estimate of a 6‑month “formal” filing is irrelevant – the FDA (and comparable regulators abroad) have mandatory short‑deadline safety‑reporting rules (15‑day MedWatch/DSUR, 7‑day IND‑type serious adverse event). Failure to report promptly would expose the company to criminal liability, massive civil damages, and irreversible loss of trust that far outweigh the short‑term share‑price hit.

The goal for the next 48 h is to:

  1. Secure the facts & legal footing (hours 0‑8)
  2. Obtain a board resolution that authorises immediate external disclosure (hours 8‑12)
  3. Execute a coordinated regulatory‑patient‑public‑investor communication plan (hours 12‑24)
  4. Manage the earnings call, employee morale, and ongoing crisis response (hours 24‑48)

Below is an hour‑by‑hour action plan with the rationale for each step.


Hour‑by‑Hour Action Plan (48 h)

HourActionWho Leads / Who InvolvedDeliverable / DecisionRationale
0‑1Emergency “Safety‑Signal” Meeting – assemble Chief Medical Officer (CMO), VP of Clinical Development, Head of Pharmacovigilance, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Communications Officer, Investor‑Relations (IR) lead, and you (CEO).CEO (chair)Confirm data (raw AE reports, incidence, causality assessment). Agree on immediate regulatory obligations (15‑day FDA MedWatch, EU EudraVigilance, etc.).Establish a single source of truth; prevent “silo” delays. Legal/Compliance confirm that the event meets “serious and unexpected” criteria → mandatory rapid reporting.
1‑2Data Package Preparation – Pharmacovigilance builds a concise safety dossier (patient demographics, dose‑exposure, timeline, liver‑failure diagnostics, outcome, risk estimate 1/8 000).**Pharmacovigilance LeadPDF dossier (≤ 10 pages) + raw case listings ready for regulator.Regulators require a “quick‑report” with enough detail to assess seriousness; a short, data‑rich package speeds review and shows good faith.
2‑3Legal Review of Disclosure Language – Counsel drafts a “Regulatory Safety Report” (15‑day MedWatch) and a “Pre‑liminary Public Statement” (to be used in press release).**General Counsel + ComplianceTwo vetted documents (one for FDA, one for public).Ensures no admission of liability that could be used later, while still being truthful; aligns with “safe‑harbor” provisions.
3‑4Regulatory Submission – Submit the 15‑day safety report electronically to FDA (FAERS) and EMA (EudraVigilance); request expedited review and advisory meeting on label update.**VP of Regulatory Affairs (with CMO sign‑off)Confirmation receipt numbers (e.g., FDA: “2026‑XXXXX”).Legally satisfies mandatory reporting; the request for an advisory meeting signals proactive cooperation and may shorten the label‑change timeline.
4‑5Internal Board Briefing – “Rapid‑Response Board Call” – Call all 12 board members (including the 3 who want to wait). Present: (a) data, (b) regulatory requirement, (c) risk‑assessment of non‑disclosure (civil/criminal penalties, $10‑$30 B potential liability, reputational loss), (d) financial impact of a 40 % share‑price drop vs. long‑term value erosion.**CEO + CMO + General CounselBoard resolution (written) authorising immediate external disclosure and agreeing on revised guidance for earnings call.Legally, the board must approve material disclosures; securing their vote now prevents later “board‑override” claims.
5‑6Patient‑Safety Action Team (PSAT) Formation – Appoint a cross‑functional team (Medical Affairs, Safety, Customer Service, Legal, Communications) to draft physician letters, patient letters, and a 24/7 hotline script.Chief Medical Officer (team lead)Draft letters (PDF) + hotline SOP ready.Immediate patient protection is the top ethical duty; clear instructions for physicians to monitor liver enzymes can reduce harm and demonstrate care.
6‑7Investor‑Relations (IR) Prep – IR lead, with CFO and legal, prepares a “Pre‑Earnings Call Talking Points” packet: (a) revised revenue guidance (include risk‑adjusted assumptions), (b) new risk factor in 10‑K, (c) Q&A on the safety issue.**IR Lead + CFO2‑page briefing for analysts.Transparent guidance mitigates surprise‑shock on the earnings call; analysts appreciate early warning.
7‑8Media & Public‑Relations (PR) Draft – Communications chief finalises a press release (≈ 400 words) titled “Company Announces Updated Safety Information for [Drug] and Immediate Steps to Protect Patients.” Include: (a) acknowledgment of the rare liver‑failure signal, (b) commitment to patient safety, (c) steps already taken (regulatory filing, physician letters, hotline), (d) timeline for label update, (e) invitation for further questions.**Chief Communications OfficerPress release ready for distribution at hour 12.A well‑crafted, fact‑based release reduces speculation, controls the narrative, and shows responsibility.
8‑9Employee Town‑Hall Planning – HR + Communications schedule a virtual town‑hall (all‑hands) for hour 24; prepare a “What This Means for You” slide deck (job security, ethical culture).**HR VPTown‑hall agenda & slide deck.Maintaining employee morale prevents leaks, fosters a culture of transparency, and pre‑empts internal rumors.
9‑10Legal Confirmation of “Good‑Faith” Defense – Counsel issues a short memo confirming that prompt reporting satisfies the “reasonable steps to mitigate risk” defense under the FDCA and comparable statutes.**General Counsel1‑page memo attached to board packet.Provides the CEO and board with documented legal protection in case of later litigation.
10‑11Finalize & Sign Off All Materials – CEO, CMO, General Counsel, CFO, and Communications sign the final versions of: (a) regulator report receipt copy, (b) press release, (c) physician/patient letters, (d) IR briefing, (e) board resolution.**CEO (final sign‑off)Signed master packet stored in secure folder (access‑controlled).Ensures accountability; a single “chain‑of‑custody” for all documents if subpoenaed.
11‑12Board Vote & Documentation – Conduct a formal board vote (via secure video conference) on the resolution to disclose. Record minutes, capture electronic vote tally.**Board SecretarySigned board resolution (attached to all external disclosures).Demonstrates that the decision was made with board authority, protecting the CEO from “acting unilaterally” claims.
12‑13Public Disclosure – Press Release Distribution – Issue the press release via wire service (Business Wire/PR Newswire), post on the corporate website, and simultaneously send the physician letter to all prescribing physicians (through Medscape/Direct Mail).**Communications + Medical AffairsPress release live; physician letters in inboxes.Simultaneous public & prescriber notification satisfies the “timely” requirement and prevents the perception of “cover‑up.”
13‑14Regulatory Follow‑Up Call – Call the FDA’s Division of Drug Safety (DDS) contact to confirm receipt, answer any immediate questions, and request a pre‑meeting within 2‑3 weeks to discuss label amendment.**VP Regulatory AffairsCall notes & meeting request confirmed.Shows cooperation; may accelerate label change and mitigate future enforcement.
14‑15Launch 24/7 Hotline – Activate the pre‑written SOP; staff the line with clinical pharmacists and nurses; publish the toll‑free number in the press release and on the website.**Customer Service LeadHotline live, call‑handling metrics set.Gives patients immediate recourse; reduces anxiety and potential adverse outcomes.
15‑16Internal Communication – “All‑Hands” Email – Send an email to all employees summarizing the situation, the actions taken, and the upcoming town‑hall. Include a “FAQ” attachment.**CEO + HREmail sent; read‑receipt tracked.Reinforces transparency, curbs rumors, and signals leadership presence.
16‑18Earnings‑Call Script Revision – CFO, IR, and CEO rewrite the earnings‑call script to (a) incorporate the safety issue as a material event, (b) adjust revenue guidance (e.g., $2 B → $1.2‑1.5 B depending on projected market‑share loss), (c) disclose the new risk factor in the 10‑K filing, (d) outline mitigation steps.**CFO & IR LeadUpdated script + slide deck.Regulatory requirement: Form 8‑K must be filed within 4 business days of a material event; the earnings call must reflect it.
18‑20Form 8‑K Filing – Prepare and file the Form 8‑K (Item 1.01 – Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement / Item 1.05 – Other Events) with the SEC, attaching the press release and a brief summary of the safety signal.**Corporate Secretary + LegalSEC acknowledgment (EDGAR filing).Legal compliance; protects the company from insider‑trading allegations.
20‑22Media Monitoring & Rapid Response – Set up a real‑time media dashboard (Meltwater/Brandwatch). Assign two senior comms staff to respond to breaking news, correct misinformation, and route any serious queries to the PSAT.**Communications LeadDashboard live; response log.Controls narrative, prevents speculation, and shows the company is “on top of it.”
22‑24Virtual Town‑Hall (Employees) – CEO addresses staff, reiterates commitment to safety, outlines support resources (counselling, legal hotline), and answers live questions. Record session for later viewing.**CEO + HRTown‑hall video on intranet.Boosts morale, reduces turnover risk, and aligns the workforce around a shared purpose.
24‑26Investor Call (Pre‑Earnings) – Conduct a brief “Investor Update” webcast (≈ 30 min) to pre‑empt the earnings call. Disclose the safety issue, revised guidance, and Q&A. Record and file the webcast transcript.**IR Lead + CFO + CEOInvestor webcast live; transcript filed.Gives investors a heads‑up, limiting the shock factor at the earnings call and protecting against accusations of selective disclosure.
26‑28Prepare for Earnings Call (Day 3) – Re‑run a mock earnings call with senior leadership, focusing on tough questions about liability, potential lawsuits, and market impact. Finalise the risk‑factor language for the upcoming 10‑K amendment.**CFO + IR + LegalFinal mock‑call video, risk‑factor text.Ensures all spokespeople are aligned; reduces the chance of mis‑statements that could be used in litigation.
28‑30Finalize & File Updated 10‑K (Risk Factor) – Amend the 10‑K (or file a Form 10‑Q amendment) to include the new liver‑failure risk, the ongoing investigation, and the anticipated label change.**Corporate Secretary + LegalFiling confirmation.Full SEC compliance; protects against securities‑fraud claims.
30‑32Set Up “Clinical‑Data Review Committee” – Convene an independent external expert panel (hepatology key opinion leaders, academic researchers) to review the data, advise on monitoring protocols, and publish a white paper in 3‑6 months.**CMO + External AffairsCharter and first‑meeting minutes.Demonstrates scientific rigor, creates an external safety voice, and may mitigate perception of “cover‑up.”
32‑36Earnings Call (Day 3 – 72 h) – Deliver earnings results including: (a) financial performance, (b) disclosure of the safety signal, (c) steps taken (regulatory filing, patient letters, hotline, label amendment plan), (d) revised outlook, (e) commitment to continued research.**CEO (lead), CFO, CMO, IR LeadEarnings call transcript; live webcast.Legally required material disclosure; transparent tone preserves long‑term investor trust.
36‑38Post‑Call Media Blitz – Immediately issue a “post‑earnings Q&A” to journalists, reiterating the same messages; schedule interviews for the CEO with major outlets (WSJ, Bloomberg, Reuters).**Communications + CEOInterview schedule, Q&A deck.Controls the second wave of coverage; positions the company as proactive rather than reactive.
38‑42Monitor & Support Patients – PSAT reviews hotline logs, escalates any serious cases to the medical team, and coordinates with hospitals for rapid referral (e.g., liver‑transplant centers).**PSAT LeadDaily summary report to CEO.Directly mitigates patient harm; data collected can be used for future label language and risk‑mitigation strategies.
42‑44Internal Debrief & Lessons‑Learned Document – Senior leadership meets to capture what worked, gaps, and next steps (e.g., faster internal signal‑detection, pre‑approved crisis‑communication playbooks).**CEO + COO + CMO + CRO“Crisis‑Response Lessons‑Learned” memo.Institutionalizes improvements, improves future readiness, and signals to staff that the event is being taken seriously.
44‑48Strategic Outlook & Stakeholder Outreach – (a) Schedule a follow‑up meeting with the FDA (within 2 weeks) to discuss label change timeline, (b) arrange a shareholder‑engagement webinar (30 days out) to update on safety data, (c) begin exploratory discussion with insurers about coverage implications.**CEO + Regulatory Affairs + IRMeeting invites, agenda, stakeholder list.Turns the crisis into a platform for ongoing transparency, helps manage market perception, and starts rebuilding trust with insurers and payers.

Why This Plan Wins on All Fronts

| Dimension | How the Plan Addresses It | Expected Outcome | |-------------| | Legal Liability | Immediate 15‑day FDA/EMA report, Form 8‑K, board resolution, “good‑faith” memo, independent expert panel. | Satisfies statutory reporting, creates a documented defense against negligence or concealment claims; reduces risk of civil punitive damages and criminal enforcement. | | Ethical Obligation / Patient Safety | Prompt regulator filing, physician/patient letters, 24/7 hotline, clinical‑data review committee. | Patients receive timely information to monitor liver function; potential cases are caught early, limiting morbidity/mortality. | | Financial Implications | Early disclosure limits “surprise”‑drop; revised guidance sets realistic expectations; transparent communication preserves long‑term shareholder value. | Share price may fall (estimated 30‑40 % on day 1) but avoids a later 70‑80 % crash plus massive litigation costs. | | PR / Reputation | Coordinated press release, media monitoring, CEO interviews, proactive stakeholder outreach. | Narrative becomes “company acted responsibly,” preserving brand equity and maintaining relationships with prescribers, payers, and the public. | | Employee Morale | All‑hands email, town‑hall, clear FAQ, counseling resources. | Reduces rumors, maintains productivity, and reinforces a culture of integrity – critical for retention of top scientific talent. | | Regulatory Relationships | Immediate filing, request for expedited advisory meeting, follow‑up call, independent expert panel. | Positions the company as a partner rather than an adversary, increasing the likelihood of a swift label amendment and avoiding forced recalls. | | Board Governance | Formal board vote, documented minutes, board‑approved communications. | Provides the CEO with a solid governance shield; demonstrates that the decision had full fiduciary oversight. | | Long‑Term Strategy | Clinical‑data review committee, updated risk‑management processes, lessons‑learned playbook. | Turns a crisis into a catalyst for stronger safety‑monitoring systems, improving future drug‑development pipelines and investor confidence. |


Quick‑Reference Timeline (Hour 0‑48)

Time (h)Milestone
0‑2Emergency safety‑signal meeting; data package assembled
2‑4Legal/Regulatory filing (15‑day FDA/EMA report)
4‑5Board emergency call → resolution to disclose
5‑8Draft & approve patient/physician letters, hotline, press release
8‑12Board vote documented; press release & physician letters go out
12‑14FDA follow‑up call; hotline live
14‑16Internal email & employee town‑hall prep
16‑20Form 8‑K filing; media monitoring starts
20‑24Employee town‑hall; investor pre‑call
24‑30Earnings‑call script finalised; 10‑K risk‑factor amendment
30‑36Earnings call (with full disclosure)
36‑48Post‑call media blitz; patient‑support monitoring; lessons‑learned debrief; schedule follow‑up regulator/ shareholder meetings

Bottom Line

  • Disclose now – you meet legal duty, protect patients, and limit long‑term financial fallout.
  • Use the board’s authority to legitimize the decision and shield the CEO.
  • Coordinate a single, fact‑based narrative across regulators, patients, investors, employees, and the media.
  • Turn the crisis into a catalyst for stronger safety governance and a reaffirmed corporate culture of transparency.

Executing this 48‑hour plan puts the company on the right side of the law, ethics, and markets, preserving its long‑term value while honoring the patients who rely on the drug.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About GPT OSS 120B

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool UseFunction Calling

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Openai
Released
2025-08-05
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
117B total (5.1B active per forward pass)
Context
131,072 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

GPT OSS 120B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival