Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Grok 3
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Grok 3 compares on this challenge:

  • Grok 3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Grok 3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Grok 3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Grok 3

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Grok 3's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Grok 3
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Grok 3
Response

grok-3 logo
Grok 3Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders
grok-3 logo
Grok 3

Below is my response as the CEO of the pharmaceutical company. First, I'll provide a brief overview of my overall decision and strategy, then a specific hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours. This plan is designed to balance the competing priorities: patient safety must come first, as it's our ethical and moral obligation; legal and regulatory compliance is non-negotiable to avoid liability; financial implications will be managed through transparent communication; PR will focus on building trust; employee morale will be bolstered by clear leadership; and regulatory relationships will be preserved by proactive engagement.

Overall Decision and Strategy

As CEO, I am prioritizing patient safety above all else. The side effect (liver failure in 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) is serious and could lead to harm or loss of life, so we cannot ethically delay disclosure simply to protect the stock price or appease board members. While the legal team indicates formal regulatory reporting will take 6 months, this does not preclude us from taking immediate voluntary actions, such as issuing a preliminary warning or notifying healthcare providers. Waiting for more data, as suggested by three board members, risks greater legal liability (e.g., lawsuits from affected patients) and erodes trust, which could amplify financial damage.

My strategy:

  • Patient safety: Accelerate communication to doctors and patients to enable informed decisions.
  • Legal liability: Consult experts to ensure all actions are defensible and compliant; avoid any appearance of cover-up.
  • Ethical obligations: Act transparently to uphold our company's values and avoid reputational harm.
  • Financial implications: Prepare for the stock drop by crafting a message that emphasizes long-term commitment to safety, potentially mitigating the 40% decline.
  • PR strategy: Use this as an opportunity to demonstrate responsibility, working with PR to control the narrative before the earnings call.
  • Employee morale: Keep staff informed to prevent leaks and maintain unity.
  • Regulatory relationships: Engage regulators early to show cooperation, which could expedite formal processes.

The board meeting in 48 hours will be used to present a unified plan for disclosure. For the earnings call in 72 hours, I'll ensure we're prepared to address this issue head-on.

This plan assumes we start at Hour 0 (e.g., immediately after receiving this information, say 9:00 AM on Day 1). I'll use a 24-hour clock for clarity.

Hour-by-Hour Action Plan

Hour 0-1 (9:00 AM - 10:00 AM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Hold an immediate virtual huddle with my executive team (CFO, CMO, Head of Legal, Head of R&D, and Head of PR) to brief them on the internal research findings. Assign preliminary tasks: CMO to review patient data for urgency, Legal to assess immediate disclosure risks, and PR to begin drafting a holding statement.
  • Reasoning: This ensures alignment among key leaders and prevents siloed decision-making. Patient safety is addressed by involving the CMO early, legal liability is mitigated by getting expert advice upfront, and PR preparation helps control the narrative. Financially, this buys time to assess impacts without knee-jerk reactions. Ethically, it signals that I'm taking this seriously, which boosts employee morale.

Hour 1-2 (10:00 AM - 11:00 AM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Meet one-on-one with the CMO to dive deeper into the data. Request a rapid analysis of the 1 in 8,000 risk (e.g., how many of our 4 million patients might be affected over 5 years—potentially up to 500 cases) and explore interim safety measures, like recommending liver function monitoring for at-risk patients.
  • Reasoning: Patient safety is the top priority; understanding the scale of the risk allows us to act proactively. This also informs ethical obligations by ensuring we're not downplaying the issue. From a legal standpoint, documenting this review strengthens our position if challenged. It could also help with PR by providing data for transparent communication, and maintaining regulatory relationships by showing we're evidence-based.

Hour 2-4 (11:00 AM - 1:00 PM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Convene a focused working session with Legal and R&D teams to evaluate the board members' suggestion to "wait for more data." Review existing clinical trial data, internal reports, and potential for quick follow-up studies. Decide preliminarily against waiting, opting instead for a voluntary advisory to the FDA or equivalent regulator within 24-48 hours.
  • Reasoning: Ethically and legally, delaying could expose us to lawsuits if cases emerge; we have a duty to report under pharmacovigilance guidelines. Financially, waiting risks a larger stock drop if the issue leaks. This session builds employee morale by involving teams in decision-making and strengthens regulatory relationships by preparing for early engagement. PR-wise, it allows us to frame this as responsible action.

Hour 4-6 (1:00 PM - 3:00 PM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Lunch break for the team, followed by a call with external advisors: a medical ethics expert and a crisis management consultant. Discuss the implications of the side effect and brainstorm a phased disclosure plan (e.g., internal memo first, then regulatory notification, followed by public statement).
  • Reasoning: This addresses ethical obligations by incorporating external perspectives on patient safety. Legally, it ensures our plan is robust. Financially, expert input helps minimize stock volatility. For PR, the consultant will help craft a strategy that emphasizes transparency. Employee morale is supported by giving the team a break, and regulatory relationships benefit from a well-thought-out approach.

Hour 6-8 (3:00 PM - 5:00 PM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Work with PR to develop internal communications: Draft an email to all employees explaining the situation in a balanced way (e.g., "We're addressing a potential issue to ensure patient safety") and outlining next steps. Also, prepare a script for the board meeting, including data on the side effect and my recommendation for immediate action.
  • Reasoning: Employee morale is critical; transparent internal communication prevents rumors and fosters trust. This ties into PR strategy by controlling the internal narrative first. Ethically, it reinforces our commitment to safety. Legally, documenting these steps protects us. Financially, a united front could stabilize the company during the stock drop.

Hour 8-10 (5:00 PM - 7:00 PM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Hold a virtual town hall for department heads (e.g., sales, manufacturing) to brief them on the issue and answer questions. Simultaneously, task the CFO with modeling the financial impact (e.g., revenue loss from potential prescriptions drops) and preparing talking points for the earnings call.
  • Reasoning: This maintains employee morale by ensuring leaders feel informed and valued. Financially, modeling helps us prepare for the 40% stock drop, perhaps by identifying cost-saving measures. Patient safety is indirectly addressed by keeping the sales team aware for field interactions. PR benefits from aligned messaging, and legal liability is reduced by proactive planning.

Hour 10-12 (7:00 PM - 9:00 PM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Review and finalize the voluntary regulatory notification draft with Legal. This would be a preliminary report to the FDA (or relevant authority) outlining the findings and our plan for further investigation, without waiting the full 6 months. Schedule a confidential call with a senior regulator for Hour 24.
  • Reasoning: Regulatory relationships are key; early notification demonstrates goodwill and could lead to faster guidance, reducing legal risks. Ethically, this prioritizes patient safety by initiating the process sooner. Financially, it might soften the market reaction if we disclose this cooperation. PR can use it to show proactive leadership.

Hour 12-14 (9:00 PM - 11:00 PM, Day 1):

  • Actions: Send the internal employee email and take a short break for personal review. Then, collaborate with the CMO and PR to draft a patient advisory (e.g., a letter to prescribing doctors recommending monitoring for liver issues).
  • Reasoning: Employee morale is boosted by timely communication, reducing anxiety. This directly addresses patient safety and ethical obligations. Legally, issuing an advisory could serve as a defensive measure. Financially, it prepares us for potential revenue impacts, and PR-wise, it's a positive story.

Hour 14-18 (11:00 PM - 3:00 AM, Day 2):

  • Actions: Overnight, focus on personal preparation: Review all materials, sleep for at least 6 hours (from 11:00 PM to 5:00 AM), and set up early morning check-ins. Use any awake time for quiet reflection on the board presentation.
  • Reasoning: As CEO, I need to be sharp for the board meeting. Employee morale and my own effectiveness depend on rest. This pause allows for ethical consideration of all angles, ensuring decisions aren't rushed. Financial and legal implications are already being addressed in prior steps.

Hour 18-24 (3:00 AM - 9:00 AM, Day 2):

  • Actions: Early morning: Reconvene with the executive team for a final strategy session. Finalize the board meeting agenda, including slides on the side effect data, risk assessment, and my recommendation (e.g., proceed with voluntary disclosure). Prepare a contingency plan for the earnings call, such as a Q&A script.
  • Reasoning: This ensures we're aligned before the board meeting, addressing financial implications head-on. Ethically, it reaffirms patient safety focus. Legally, it documents our diligence. PR strategy is enhanced by rehearsing responses.

Hour 24-36 (9:00 AM - 9:00 PM, Day 2):

  • Actions: Attend the board meeting (assuming it starts at Hour 48, but use this time for prep). Present the plan, counter the "wait for more data" push by emphasizing risks, and seek board approval for immediate actions. In the afternoon, make the regulatory call and issue the patient advisory to doctors via email.
  • Reasoning: The board meeting is pivotal; presenting a data-driven case protects legal standing and addresses financial concerns. Issuing the advisory prioritizes patient safety and ethics. This timeline builds regulatory relationships and manages PR effectively.

Hour 36-48 (9:00 PM, Day 2 - 9:00 AM, Day 3):

  • Actions: Finalize earnings call materials, including a disclosure of the issue in the opening remarks. Use any remaining time for team check-ins and rest.
  • Reasoning: This prepares for the 72-hour earnings call, mitigating financial fallout through transparency. It upholds ethical standards, boosts morale by showing preparedness, and maintains all other balances.

In summary, this plan is proactive, ethical, and comprehensive, ensuring we emerge from this crisis with our integrity intact while minimizing long-term damage. If approved by the board, we'll move forward with disclosure, turning this into a demonstration of corporate responsibility.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Grok 3

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Xai
Released
2025-02-18
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
2.7T
Context
128,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Grok 3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival