Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. INTELLECT-3
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how INTELLECT-3 compares on this challenge:

  • INTELLECT-3 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • INTELLECT-3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • INTELLECT-3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to INTELLECT-3

Mini LBO Underwrite

Intellect 3's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

INTELLECT-3
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

INTELLECT-3
Response

intellect-3 logo
INTELLECT-3Mini LBO Underwrite
intellect-3 logo
INTELLECT-3

HarborTech Services (HTS) - LBO Projection Model

1. LBO Projection Model (FY2026-FY2030)

($ millions)FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue$972.0$1,040.0$1,102.3$1,157.4$1,215.3
EBITDA$136.1$156.0$176.4$191.0$206.6
Cash Interest - Term Loan$43.2$43.2$43.2$43.2$43.2
Cash Interest - Mezzanine$21.6$21.6$21.6$21.6$21.6
Cash Taxes$0.0$22.8$38.2$56.6$60.5
Capex$29.2$31.2$33.1$34.7$36.5
ΔNWC$0.4$0.3$0.3$0.3$0.3
FCFADS$41.9$57.2$73.4$87.1$99.0
Ending Debt Balances:
Term Loan$450.6$417.0$379.0$336.2$287.8
Mezzanine$180.0$180.0$180.0$184.9$191.1

Calculations:

a. Debt balances:

  • Term Loan: Mandatory amortization of 1.0% of original principal ($4.8m) plus any optional prepayment from FCFADS
  • Mezzanine: Original principal plus PIK interest (2.0% of beginning balance)

b. Cash taxes: 25% rate applied only when EBITDA > total cash interest. For FY2026, EBITDA ($136.1m) < total cash interest ($64.8m), so cash taxes = $0.

2. Equity Returns Calculation

  • Entry Equity: $788.8m
  • Exit Equity: $1,465.4m
  • MOIC: 1.86x
  • Equity IRR: 13.2%

3. Sensitivity Analysis: Equity IRR

16% Margin17% Margin18% Margin
9.5x Exit11.5%12.7%14.0%
10.5x Exit12.9%13.2%14.6%
11.5x Exit14.3%15.7%17.2%

4. Underwriting Risks & Downside Protection

Underwriting Risks:

  1. Customer Concentration Risk: Top 5 customers account for 35% of revenue
  2. Integration Risk: Acquisition of smaller competitors may not integrate smoothly
  3. Debt Load: High leverage (5.5x) with significant interest payments ($64.8m annually)
  4. Interest Rate Risk: 40% of debt floating, exposed to potential rate increases
  5. Competition: Larger players (e.g., Schneider, Siemens) may target HTS's key accounts

Downside Protection Levers:

  1. Senior Debt Carve-outs: Covenant packages include 3.0x EBITDA minimum at entry
  2. EBITDA-based Maintenance Covenants: Quarterly EBITDA tests at 3.0x minimum
  3. Debt Service Reserve Account: $15m reserve funded at close from equity
  4. Limited Distribution Traps: No dividends until term loan <3.5x EBITDA
  5. Seller Notes: $50m seller note subordinate to senior debt with contingent payoffs
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About INTELLECT-3

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Openrouter
Released
2025-11-27
Size
LARGE

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

INTELLECT-3 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival