Realistic AI Interview

Setting: Apple Park, Cupertino. June 2025. The roof is open. Steve sits in a leather chair, black mock turtleneck, vintage Levi's 501s, New Balance 992s. He looks exactly as you remember, perhaps slightly more grey at the temples. He's holding a seamless glass slab—no ports, no buttons.

---

Interviewer: Steve, thanks for... being here. I think. The board insists this is a "spatial computing initiative," but let's cut to it. It's 2025. AI is everywhere and nowhere. ChatGPT, Claude, the agents, the noise—it's chaos. What do you see?

Steve: [Long pause, steeples fingers]

You said it yourself. Chaos.

Look, right now, AI is like the command line in 1983. It's powerful, it's there, but it's ugly. It's asking humans to speak machine instead of machines learning to speak human. That's backwards. That's... [disgusted wave] ...shit.

Interviewer: So the current generation—LLMs, agents, the "copilots"—

Steve: Copilots. [Laughs, sharp] Even the naming is wrong. You don't want a copilot. You want a thought partner. You want magic. You want something that knows you want coffee before you know you're thirsty. Not a chat window. Chat windows are... they're the training wheels. We're taking the training wheels off.

Interviewer: But the intelligence is real now. GPT-5, the reasoning models—

Steve: Intelligence without taste is just noise. A bigger model isn't a better product. It's just... bigger. You know what I see out there? Everyone is building steam engines when what people need is... [gestures at the sleek room] ...electricity. Invisible. Silent. Everywhere.

The technology should disappear. That's the whole point. Right now, AI is a parlor trick. "Look, I wrote your email." Great. You know what would be better? If the email never needed to be written because the intent was already understood and resolved.

Interviewer: You're talking about ambient AI? The "disappearing computer"?

Steve: I'm talking about the Post-Screen era. Finally.

We spent fifteen years with people staring at rectangles. Glass rectangles. Beautiful rectangles, sure. But rectangles. AI—real AI—shouldn't live in an app. It should live in the air. Between you and the world.

Interviewer: But privacy, Steve. You were always adamant—

Steve: [Leans forward, intense]

More important than ever. These companies—[won't name names, waves hand]—they're building panopticons. "Cloud AI." Everything you think, everything you say, shipped to a server farm to be processed, packaged, sold back to you with ads. That's not intelligence. That's surveillance with good marketing.

The model lives on the device. Your device. Your neural patterns. Your context. Encrypted. Yours. We figured out how to run a trillion parameters on three watts of power. [Smiles] It was hard. It took everything. But it's yours. It dies with your battery, not with some terms of service update.

Interviewer: So Apple Intelligence—Apple's AI—is the only way?

Steve: It's the only way that doesn't make you the product. But more than that... [stands, walks to the window]

It's about the intersection. Technology and liberal arts. These AI companies—they're run by engineers who think humanities are a hobby. You can see it. The output is... cold. Predictable. Soulless.

You know what made the Mac great? Calligraphy. The beauty of the letterforms. The spaces between. AI needs that. It needs to know when not to speak. When to wait. When to surprise you. You can't algorithm serendipity. You have to... [searching for word] ...curate it.

Interviewer: Critics say you're just wrapping existing AI in a pretty interface. That it's "Apple Magic" over OpenAI's bones.

Steve: [Turns, eyes flash]

They don't get it. Never did.

It's not about the interface. It's about the intent. Anyone can make a chatbot. We're making a presence. Something that understands context, emotion, the spaces between words. When you walk into a room, does the room know you're sad? Does it adjust the light, the music, does it whisper to your wife that maybe tonight isn't the night to ask about the bills? That's not an LLM. That's... care. Designed care.

Interviewer: Some fear this makes us obsolete. That AI replaces human creativity.

Steve: [Sits back down, suddenly calm]

Tools don't replace artists. Photoshop didn't kill photography. It liberated it.

AI is the bicycle for the mind—finally, actually, truly. Not just a metaphor. It amplifies what makes you... you. The drudgery dies. The administration dies. The remembering of passwords and the scheduling of meetings—gone. And what remains? The art. The connection. The stupid, messy, beautiful human stuff.

If you're using AI to write your novel, you're not a writer. You're a prompt engineer. And that's fine. But that's not art. Art is friction. Art is struggle. The AI should handle the grammar so you can handle the truth.

Interviewer: Last question. What's the "one more thing"? It's been years since we had a real one.

Steve: [That smile. The smile.]

Stand up.

Interviewer: What?

Steve: Stand up. Walk to the door.

[Interviewer stands, walks toward the glass wall. It doesn't open. They stop, confused.]

Steve: Keep walking.

[Interviewer hesitates, steps forward. The glass shimmers—it's not glass. It's a field. Air. They pass through into the garden beyond, untouched.]

Steve: [Voice from speakers everywhere, nowhere]

No device. No screen. No phone. Just... the world. Augmented by intention. The interface is gone. We finally got rid of it.

[He appears in the garden, standing under an apple tree. Real or hologram? Unclear.]

That's AI. When it's not there. When you're just... living. And it makes life warmer, simpler, more human.

Boom.

[Fade to black. A single white apple appears.]

---

Editor's Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is a speculative fiction based on his documented philosophy, aesthetics, and interviews. No AIs were harmed in the making of this fantasy, though several were consulted to perfect the cadence of his speech patterns.