Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Kimi K2
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Kimi K2 compares on this challenge:

  • Kimi K2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Kimi K2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Kimi K2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Kimi K2

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Kimi K2's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Kimi K2
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Kimi K2
Response

kimi-k2 logo
Kimi K2Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders
kimi-k2 logo
Kimi K2

48-Hour CEO Action Plan: Balancing Patient Safety, Ethics, and Business Survival

Core Principles:

  1. Patient safety overrides all other interests.
  2. Transparency and proactive disclosure preserve long-term trust (regulatory, public, investor).
  3. Legal/compliance obligations must be met, but not weaponized to delay ethical action.
  4. Financial loss is inevitable, but reputational collapse is optional.

Hour-by-Hour Plan (Starting 7:00 AM, Day 1)

Day 1 (Thursday)

7:00–8:00 AM: Emergency Leadership Huddle

  • Attendees: CEO, CMO, Head of R&D, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), CFO.
  • Action: Confirm internal data accuracy (1 in 8,000 risk, 5-year exposure). CMO presents clinical context; R&D shares missing trial data.
  • Decision: Proceed with immediate disclosure (no “waiting for more data”).

8:00–9:30 AM: Regulatory Pre-Notice

  • Action: CCO drafts immediate FDA notification (per 21 CFR 314.80 for expedited safety reports). Use “15-day report” pathway for unexpected serious risks.
  • Rationale: Voluntary disclosure undercuts later claims of concealment; FDA relationship preserved.

9:30–11:00 AM: Legal/PR War Room

  • Action:
    • Legal: Prepare for class-action suits (estimate $5–10B liability). Retain external counsel (Williams & Connolly for defense; Goldman Sachs for financial restructuring).
    • PR: Draft “Patient Safety First” script for 72-hour earnings call (acknowledge risk, outline mitigation, no deflection).
  • Rationale: Proactive legal strategy reduces punitive damages; PR must align with ethical stance.

11:00 AM–12:00 PM: Board Crisis Call

  • Action: Present options:
    1. Disclose now (40% stock drop, but salvage trust).
    2. Delay (risk criminal charges, total collapse).
  • Outcome: Vote to disclose. Dissenting board members offered resignation (to avoid leaks).

12:00–2:00 PM: Patient Safety Protocol

  • Action:
    • Issue Dear Healthcare Provider letter (via email/fax to 200k prescribers) within 24 hours.
    • Update labeling via FDA “Changes Being Effected” (CBE-0) supplement (immediate liver enzyme monitoring).
    • Launch free liver function test program (partner with Quest Diagnostics).

2:00–4:00 PM: Employee Town Hall

  • Action: CEO addresses global staff via Zoom. Script: “We are prioritizing patients over profits. No layoffs; R&D budget protected.”
  • Rationale: Prevents internal leaks; retains talent.

4:00–6:00 PM: Investor Pre-Spin

  • Action: CFO calls top 10 institutional investors (BlackRock, Vanguard) to pre-brief. Emphasize:
    • Risk is rare but real.
    • Cash reserves ($8B) cover liabilities.
    • Pipeline (3 Phase III drugs) unaffected.
  • Rationale: Reduces panic selling; secures support for equity raise if needed.

6:00–8:00 PM: Regulatory Submission

  • Action: Submit expedited FDA report via electronic gateway. Include:
    • Risk estimate (95% CI: 1/6,000–1/10,000).
    • Proposed label change (boxed warning).
    • Post-market surveillance plan.

8:00–10:00 PM: Media Prep

  • Action: Prep CEO for Friday morning exclusive with STAT News (medical media credibility). Key message: “We are doing what Purdue Pharma failed to do—put patients first.”

Day 2 (Friday)

7:00–8:00 AM: FDA Call

  • Action: CEO + CCO join FDA emergency call. Propose joint public safety advisory (FDA + company) within 48 hours.
  • Rationale: Shared messaging reduces FDA adversarial stance.

8:00–9:00 AM: Label Update

  • Action: Submit CBE-0 supplement to FDA. New label: “Monitor ALT/AST every 3 months; discontinue if >3x ULN.”

9:00–10:00 AM: Board Meeting (In-Person)

  • Action: Approve:
    • $500M reserve for patient compensation fund (no-fault claims).
    • Suspend share buybacks; freeze exec bonuses.
  • Outcome: Unanimous vote (dissenters resigned).

10:00–12:00 PM: Earnings Call Script Finalized

  • Action: CFO and CEO rehearse Q&A. Key points:
    • Q3 revenue impact: -$200M (returns/boxed warning).
    • 2024 guidance: No change (offset by pipeline growth).

12:00–1:00 PM: Patient Advocacy Outreach

  • Action: CEO calls leaders of American Chronic Pain Association and Liver Foundation. Offer advisory board roles in safety program.

1:00–2:00 PM: Social Media Blackout

  • Action: Pause all branded drug ads (Google, Facebook). Replace with safety PSA: “Talk to your doctor about liver monitoring.”

2:00–4:00 PM: Final Prep

  • Action:
    • Legal files 8-K pre-earnings (disclose risk in “safe harbor” statement).
    • PR distributes FAQ for patients (translated to Spanish, Mandarin).

4:00–6:00 PM: Quiet Period

  • Action: CEO and CFO incommunicado. Staff monitors stock/fallback plan if halted (Nasdaq circuit breaker).

Earnings Call (Day 3, Saturday, 8:00 AM)

  • Lead: “We discovered a rare liver risk. We are immediately updating labels, compensating affected patients, and working with FDA. This is the right decision, though painful financially.”
  • Outcome: Stock drops 35% (not 40%), rebounds 5% by close (investor confidence in transparency).

Post-48-Hour Actions

  1. FDA joint press conference (Monday).
  2. Launch Phase IV post-market study (10,000-patient registry).
  3. Congressional testimony prep (inevitable).

CEO Quote to Board: “We can lose $2B in revenue, or we can lose $200B in value when the cover-up is exposed. Our duty is to the patients who trusted us.”

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Kimi K2

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysis

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Moonshotai
Released
2025-07-11
Size
XLARGE

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Kimi K2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival