4 models have responded to the "Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Llama 3 1 70B's response to the 'Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert' challenge.
Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced software engineer** who has built distributed systems and APIs but has never touched machine learning. They're skeptical that "predicting the next word" can produce intelligent behavior. 2. **A PhD physicist** who thinks AI is overhyped and wants to understand what's actually novel vs. what's just well-marketed linear algebra. They expect mathematical precision. 3. **A venture capitalist** evaluating an AI startup. They need to understand the technology well enough to assess defensibility, moats, and whether the founders' claims are credible. Each explanation should be 2-3 paragraphs, tailored to their specific background, vocabulary, concerns, and what they'd find most compelling or interesting. Don't just change the difficulty level — change the framing, examples, and emphasis for each audience.
For the experienced software engineer:
You're likely familiar with the concept of prediction in distributed systems, where a model predicts the likelihood of a certain event or outcome. Large language models like GPT or Claude take this concept to the next level by predicting the next word in a sequence of text. But how does this lead to intelligent behavior? Think of it like this: when you're building an API, you need to anticipate what the user will request next. Similarly, a language model predicts the next word based on the context of the conversation, using patterns learned from vast amounts of text data.
The key difference is that these models use a type of neural network called a transformer, which is designed to capture long-range dependencies in text. This allows them to understand the nuances of language, such as idioms, metaphors, and context-dependent expressions. But what really sets them apart is their ability to generate coherent text, rather than just predicting individual words. This is achieved through a process called masked language modeling, where the model is trained to fill in blanks in a sentence, effectively "writing" the next word based on the context.
Now, you might be thinking, "But isn't this just a fancy version of auto-complete?" Not quite. While auto-complete relies on simple heuristics like prefix matching, large language models use complex patterns learned from massive datasets to generate text that's often indistinguishable from human writing. This is what makes them so powerful – they can be fine-tuned for specific tasks, like generating product descriptions or responding to customer queries, to produce high-quality text that's tailored to the task at hand.
For the PhD physicist:
You're likely familiar with the concept of statistical mechanics, where the behavior of a system is predicted based on the statistical properties of its constituent parts. Large language models can be thought of in a similar way – they model the statistical properties of language, using techniques like masked language modeling to learn the patterns and structures that underlie human communication. But what's novel here is the use of transformers to capture long-range dependencies in text, which allows the model to understand the context-dependent relationships between words.
Mathematically, this can be represented as a Markov chain, where the probability of a word is conditioned on the previous words in the sequence. However, traditional Markov chains are limited by their assumption of a fixed window size, whereas transformers use self-attention mechanisms to capture dependencies across the entire input sequence. This allows the model to learn complex patterns and relationships that are not immediately apparent from the input data.
But what's really interesting is the connection to information theory – the model's ability to compress and represent complex patterns in language can be seen as a form of data compression, where the model learns to represent the underlying structure of the data in a compact and efficient way. This has implications for our understanding of human language and cognition, as it suggests that the human brain may be using similar mechanisms to process and generate language.
For the venture capitalist:
As you evaluate an AI startup, you're likely looking for defensibility, moats, and a clear understanding of the technology. Large language models like GPT or Claude are a key area of focus for many AI startups, and for good reason – they have the potential to disrupt a wide range of industries, from customer service to content creation.
But what's the real value proposition here? It's not just about generating text – it's about creating a platform that can understand and respond to human language in a way that's indistinguishable from a human. This has huge implications for industries like customer service, where chatbots can be used to automate routine queries and free up human agents to focus on more complex tasks.
The defensibility of this technology lies in the data – the massive amounts of text data that are required to train these models are a significant barrier to entry for new competitors. Additionally, the expertise and resources required to fine-tune and deploy these models are substantial, making it difficult for new entrants to compete. As a venture capitalist, you should be looking for startups that have a clear understanding of the technology, a strong team with expertise in NLP, and a clear plan for how they intend to monetize their IP.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link