4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Minimax M2 Her's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
Let's analyze this architecture systematically:
1. Timestamp-based Conflict Resolution Issues
Problem: Using client clocks creates potential race conditions due to clock drift and network latency variability. If two users edit the same content near simultaneously but clocks aren't synchronized, the actual last edit might not win.
Solution: Implement logical timestamps (Lamport clocks) or true-time servers (like Spanner). Client sends opId, server increments sequence, gives you serverOpId that enforces causality.
Trade-offs: Higher complexity, requires versioning database records
2. WebSocket Connection Management
Problem: Sticky sessions needed for WebSocket clients (same client must connect to same server). Users could lose connection during server scaling events.
Solution: Implement Pub/Sub pattern with Redis. All servers subscribe to changes, allowing any server to broadcast updates to clients.
Trade-offs: Higher infrastructure cost, adds latency for initial broadcast
3. Full Snapshot Save Bottleneck
Problem: Saving full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds under high edit frequency creates database contention.
Solution: Implement delta updates - store diffs between versions, only snapshot on major changes. Store deltas with expiry based on version frequency.
Trade-offs: Need periodic compaction of deltas to snapshots
4. Session Cache Inconsistency
Problem: JWT tokens stored in localStorage are vulnerable to XSS, leading to session hijacking.
Solution: Move JWT to httpOnly cookies with CSRF protection. Revoke tokens server-side using Redis blacklist.
Trade-offs: CORS restrictions, additional CSRF token handling
5. Database Partitioning Issues
Problem: Organization-level partitioning creates hot partitions for large organizations. Write amplification when organizations cross partition boundaries.
Solution: Shard by document ID and maintain cross-shard consistency through distributed transactions. Use eventual consistency with quorum writes.
Trade-offs: Read latency increases, requires transaction coordination overhead
6. CDN Cache Invalidation
Problem: API responses cached for 5 minutes means stale data during active collaboration.
Solution: Implement cache invalidation via WebSocket triggers or CDN PATCH API with adaptive TTLs.
Trade-offs: Increases CDN costs, requires additional tooling
7. PostgreSQL Write Contention
Problem: High-frequency document updates create write bottlenecks in PostgreSQL.
Solution: Implement append-only logs for each document, batch writes, and use replication with read replicas.
Trade-offs: More storage needed, increased complexity for data integrity
8. Document Version Rollback
Problem: Conflicts causing content loss when two clients edit same section.
Solution: Store complete document history with revert functionality, maintain author info. Implement operational transform (OT) or CRDT for true collaborative editing.
Trade-offs: Much higher storage requirements, complex conflict resolution
9. Load Balancer State
Problem: Round-robin LB doesn't consider server load or WebSocket connection count.
Solution: Switch to least-connections algorithm with health checks. Add connection pooling with connection limits per server.
Trade-offs: Higher operational complexity, need to monitor active connections
10. Recovery Scenario Race Conditions
Problem: Server failure causes lost in-memory state and reconnections.
Solution: Implement server recovery protocol with document state reconstruction, client reconnection strategy, and state reconciliation using database version.
Trade-offs: Significant complexity increase, possible data inconsistencies during recovery
The key insight is that real-time collaboration systems face fundamental tradeoffs between consistency, availability, and partition tolerance. The proposed solutions often shift complexity from one area to another, requiring careful analysis of your specific use case and scaling requirements. Would you like me to elaborate on any of these solutions or discuss alternatives?
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link